Dual form of Littlewood's conjecture in d dimensions

Let H(m)H(\mathbf m) denote the multiplicative height of mZd\mathbf m \in \mathbb Z^d, and let αRd{\boldsymbol{\alpha}} \in \mathbb R^d with d2d \geqslant 2. Dual form of Littlewood's conjecture.

inf0mZdH(m)mα=0.\inf_{{\boldsymbol 0} \ne \mathbf m \in \mathbb Z^d} H(\mathbf m) \| \mathbf m \cdot {\boldsymbol{\alpha}} \| = 0.

The paper states that this formulation is equivalent to Littlewood's conjecture, citing Cassels–Swinnerton-Dyer and Dani–Margulis-type results. It remains open for d2d \geqslant 2.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Sam Chow and Niclas Technau, “Smooth discrepancy and Littlewood's conjecture”, arXiv:2409.17006 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.