The surjectivity conjecture for Springer-fiber restriction maps

About 2 years old · traced to

Let \fg\fg be a classical Lie algebra of type BB, CC, or DD, with dual Lie algebra \fg∨\fg^\vee, and let e∨∈\fg∨e^\vee\in\fg^\vee be nilpotent with partition λ∨\lambda^\vee. Let \fl∨\fl^\vee be a Levi subalgebra containing a regular representative associated with e∨e^\vee, and let

i∗:H∗(\cB∨)⟶H∗(\spr)i^*:H^*(\cB^\vee)\longrightarrow H^*(\spr)

be the pullback from the flag variety of \fg∨\fg^\vee to the relevant Springer fiber. The surjectivity conjecture. The map i∗i^* is surjective exactly in the following cases: (1) \fg∨=\fsp2n\fg^\vee=\fsp_{2n} and e∨e^\vee is regular in \lv=\fsp2a×∏i=1k\fglbi\lv=\fsp_{2a}\times\prod_{i=1}^{k}\fgl_{b_i} with bi∈{2a+1,2a,2a−1,1}b_i\in\{2a+1,2a,2a-1,1\}; (2) \fg∨=\fso2n+1\fg^\vee=\fso_{2n+1} and e∨e^\vee is regular in \lv=\fso2a+1×∏i=1k\fglbi\lv=\fso_{2a+1}\times\prod_{i=1}^{k}\fgl_{b_i} with bi∈{2a+2,2a+1,2a}b_i\in\{2a+2,2a+1,2a\}; or (3) \fg∨=\fso2n\fg^\vee=\fso_{2n} and λ∨\lambda^\vee has one of the five displayed forms in the source statement. This conjecture is attributed to HMK2024 and is used to formulate the paper's conditional Hikita results; the paper proves only certain cases.

References

Primary source

Do Kien Hoang, “Hikita conjecture for classical Lie algebras”, arXiv:2409.13914 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.