Rectangular Sinkhorn-limit polynomial conjecture with sign alterations

Let AA be a positive m×nm \times n matrix, let D(m,n)D(m,n) be the set of minor specifications described in the paper, and let M(S)M(S) be the associated product of minors. For SD(m,n)S \subseteq D(m,n), let adjS,σ(S)(m,n)\operatorname{adj}_{S,\sigma(S)}(m,n) be the sign-altered adjacency matrix defined in the paper. Let xx be the top-left entry of Sink(A)\operatorname{Sink}(A). Rectangular polynomial conjecture. For every SD(m,n)S \subseteq D(m,n), there is a sign alteration σ(S)\sigma(S), with diagonal signs equal to 11, such that

SD(m,n)(detadjS,σ(S)(m,n))M(S)xS=0.\sum_{S \subseteq D(m,n)}\left(\det\operatorname{adj}_{S,\sigma(S)}(m,n)\right)M(S)x^{|S|}=0.

The sign alterations can be chosen invariant on equivalence classes, independent of mm and nn, and dependent only on the link structure of SS. This is the paper's main open question; identifying canonical correct sign alterations remains unresolved.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Eric Rowland and Jason Wu, “The entries of the Sinkhorn limit of an m n matrix”, arXiv:2409.02789 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.