The fractional-support exclusion conjecture

From papers

Let R=C[x1/d,y]\overline{\mathcal{R}}=\mathbb{C}[x^{1/\mathbf d},y] for a fixed positive integer d\mathbf d, and let Tm,n,a\overline{T}_{m,n,a} be the class defined in the paper. Suppose F,GRF,G\in\overline{\mathcal{R}} satisfy [F,G]C{0}[F,G]\in\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}, FTm,n,aF\in\overline{T}_{m,n,a}, GTbm/a,bn/a,bG\in\overline{T}_{bm/a,bn/a,b}, and N0(F)N^0(F) is similar to N0(G)N^0(G) with the origin as center and ratio deg(F):deg(G)=a:b\deg(F):\deg(G)=a:b. The fractional-support exclusion conjecture. Then

(aa+b,0)N0(F),(ba+b,0)N0(G).\left(\frac{a}{a+b},0\right)\notin N^0(F),\qquad \left(\frac{b}{a+b},0\right)\notin N^0(G).

This is part of the paper's proposed analysis of the Jacobian conjecture; no resolution is supplied.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kyungyong Lee and Li Li, “On the two-dimensional Jacobian conjecture: Magnus' formula revisited, IV”, arXiv:2408.01279 (2024).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.