Internal characterization of non-horocyclically convex domains in the unit disk

About 2 years old · traced to

Let D\mathbb{D} denote the unit disk, and let GG be a simply connected subdomain of D\mathbb{D}. Let C\mathcal{C} be the class of domains Ω⊂D\Omega\subset\mathbb{D} of the form D1∖D2‾D_1\setminus\overline{D_2}, where each DjD_j is a hyperbolic disk in D\mathbb{D} and ∂D1\partial D_1 and ∂D2\partial D_2 intersect orthogonally at two points in D\mathbb{D}. For Ω∈C\Omega\in\mathcal{C}, let m(Ω)m(\Omega) denote the hyperbolic midpoint of the hyperbolically concave boundary arc ∂D2∩D1\partial D_2\cap D_1 of Ω\Omega. Internal characterization conjecture. GG is not horocyclically convex in D\mathbb{D} if and only if there is a domain Ω∈C\Omega\in\mathcal{C} such that Ω⊂G\Omega\subset G and m(Ω)∈∂G∩Dm(\Omega)\in\partial G\cap\mathbb{D}. The paper presents this as a proposed characterization motivated by known results on lower bounds for the hyperbolic metric, but states that the related questions have no answers in the current work.

References

Primary source

Juan Arango, Hugo Arbeláez and Diego Mejía, “On an Internal Characterization of Horocyclically Convex Domains in the Unit Disk”, arXiv:2407.21271 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.