Conjecture on norm-dependent optimality of triangular and square lattices
Conjecture on norm-dependent optimality of triangular and square lattices
Let . Let denote the unit-covolume planar lattice space and the planar lattice space, let be the Epstein zeta function associated with the -norm, and let be the corresponding Lennard–Jones energy. Write for the triangular lattice, and let and be the specified optimal scaling factors.
Optimality conjecture for triangular and square lattices. There exist and such that, up to rotation, the following hold:
- For in :
- for all , the minimizer is ;
- for all , the minimizer is .
- For in :
- for all , the minimizer is ;
- for all , the minimizer is .
The conjecture predicts phase transitions in the optimal lattice as the norm varies. The triangular lattice is optimal in the stated low- Epstein-zeta range, while square-lattice optimality occurs on an intermediate range; for the Lennard–Jones energy, the triangular and square lattices are predicted on the stated ranges. The claims are based on numerical simulations and remain open.
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Laurent Bétermin and Camille Furlanetto, “On crystallization in the plane for pair potentials with an arbitrary norm”, arXiv:2407.20762 (2026).
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.