Non-commutativity and linguization of Oshida-Rule

Let AA be the honest matrix associated with mZ>1m\in\mathbb{Z}_{>1}, and let the identity labelled Oshida-Rule Before be

hhf1f12m1(e)=H245H2452m1hh(e).h'\circ h\circ\underbrace{f_1\circ\cdots\circ f_1}_{2m-1}(e)=\underbrace{H_{245}\circ\cdots\circ H_{245}}_{2m-1}\circ h'\circ h(e).

Non-commutativity and linguization of Oshida-Rule. It is not possible to prove from the supplied formulation that this identity holds using matrices AA; equivalently, it is not possible to prove from these matrices that H245H_{245} can be constructed using AA.

This is presented as a limitation of the matrix formulation rather than as an asserted mathematical equality or inequality. The source does not state whether the issue has been resolved.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Yohei Oshida, “Ghost-OSD Method on Numerical Max-Plus Algebra”, arXiv:2407.10682 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.