Non-commutativity and linguization of Oshida-Rule

About 2 years old · traced to

Let AA be the honest matrix associated with m∈Z>1m\in\mathbb{Z}_{>1}, and let the identity labelled Oshida-Rule Before be

h′∘h∘f1∘⋯∘f1⏟2m−1(e)=H245∘⋯∘H245⏟2m−1∘h′∘h(e).h'\circ h\circ\underbrace{f_1\circ\cdots\circ f_1}_{2m-1}(e)=\underbrace{H_{245}\circ\cdots\circ H_{245}}_{2m-1}\circ h'\circ h(e).

Non-commutativity and linguization of Oshida-Rule. It is not possible to prove from the supplied formulation that this identity holds using matrices AA; equivalently, it is not possible to prove from these matrices that H245H_{245} can be constructed using AA.

This is presented as a limitation of the matrix formulation rather than as an asserted mathematical equality or inequality. The source does not state whether the issue has been resolved.

References

Primary source

Yohei Oshida, “Ghost-OSD Method on Numerical Max-Plus Algebra”, arXiv:2407.10682 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.