Height inequality conjecture for Beilinson–Bloch heights

About 2 years old · traced to

Let SS be a quasi-projective variety over a number field KK, let f ⁣:X→Sf\colon X\to S be a smooth projective family with relatively ample line bundle NN, and let ZZ be the family of cycles defining the normal function and Betti stratum SBetti(1)S^{\mathrm{Betti}}(1). Set

Samp=S∖SBetti(1).S^{\mathrm{amp}}=S\setminus S^{\mathrm{Betti}}(1).

A function on S(Q‾)S(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}) is a dominant height on an open subvariety UU if it satisfies the stated lower bound against a logarithmic Weil height on UU. Height inequality conjecture. The Beilinson–Bloch height function s↦⟨Zs,Zs⟩BBs\mapsto\langle Z_s,Z_s\rangle_{\mathrm{BB}} is a dominant height on SampS^{\mathrm{amp}}. Moreover, SampS^{\mathrm{amp}} is the largest open subvariety of SS on which this function is a dominant height. This predicts both a height lower bound away from the Betti stratum and the maximality of its domain; the source presents it as a conjecture and gives no resolution.

References

Primary source

Ziyang Gao and Shou-Wu Zhang, “Heights of Ceresa and Gross-Schoen cycles”, arXiv:2407.01304 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.