Haines's invariance conjecture under isomorphisms

About 2 years old · traced to

Let bbalpha:bbG\tobbG′bbalpha:bbG\tobbG' be an isomorphism of connected reductive groups, let bbpi\inbbPibbC(bbG)bbpi\inbbPi_{bbC}(bbG), and let bbalphabbpi{}^{bbalpha}bbpi be the irreducible representation of bbG′bbG' obtained by pre-composing with bbalpha−1bbalpha^{-1}. Haines's invariance conjecture. The induced isomorphism Lbbalpha:LbbG′(bbC)→LbbG(bbC){}^Lbbalpha:{}^LbbG'(bbC)\to{}^LbbG(bbC) takes the bbhatbbG′(bbC)bbhat{bbG'}(bbC)-conjugacy class of (bbmathcalLLbbG′(bbalphabbpi))ss(bbmathcal{LL}_{bbG'}({}^{bbalpha}bbpi))_{ss} to the bbhatbbG(bbC)bbhat{bbG}(bbC)-conjugacy class of (bbmathcalLLbbG(bbpi))ss(bbmathcal{LL}_{bbG}(bbpi))_{ss}.

This is the semisimplified form of Haines's invariance conjecture under isomorphisms. The supplied text gives no resolution status.

References

Primary source

Jean-François Dat, David Helm, Robert Kurinczuk and Gilbert Moss, “Local Langlands in families: The banal case”, arXiv:2406.09283 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.