Congruence conjecture for coefficients of classical modular polynomials

At least 1 year old · documented by

Let ellell be a prime, let am,na_{m,n} be the coefficient of the classical modular polynomial Φell(X,Y)\Phi_ell(X,Y), and suppose ell+1>m+nell+1>m+n. Define

c:=ell+1−m−n.c:=ell+1-m-n.

Congruence conjecture. The following divisibilities hold: if ell≠2ell\ne 2, then am,n≡0(mod215c)a_{m,n}\equiv 0\pmod{2^{15c}}; if ell≠3ell\ne 3, then am,n≡0(mod33c)a_{m,n}\equiv 0\pmod{3^{3c}}, and if additionally ell≡1(mod3)ell\equiv 1\pmod 3, then am,n≡0(mod3⌈9c/2⌉)a_{m,n}\equiv 0\pmod{3^{\lceil 9c/2\rceil}}; if ell≠5ell\ne 5, then am,n≡0(mod53c)a_{m,n}\equiv 0\pmod{5^{3c}}. These predicted congruences motivate the study of divisibility properties of modular-polynomial coefficients; the source presents them as a conjecture and gives supporting computations, while related special cases are proved later.

References

Primary source

Haiyang Wang, “Congruence properties of the coefficients of the classical modular polynomials”, arXiv:2406.01986 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.