Twin-free reduction conjecture for (3+1)(3+1)-free posets

Let PP be a (3+1)(3+1)-free poset, meaning that it contains no induced subposet isomorphic to the disjoint union of a 33-chain and a 11-chain. Call PP twin-free when there is no graph GG with a vertex vv such that Inc(P)=Gv\operatorname{Inc}(P)=G_v, where GvG_v is obtained by twinning GG at vv.

Twin-free reduction conjecture. If PP is (3+1)(3+1)-free and twin-free, then XInc(P)(x)X_{\operatorname{Inc}(P)}(\mathbf{x}) is ee-positive.

The source says that, if the preceding (3+1)(3+1)-free twinning conjecture is solved, the Stanley–Stembridge conjecture can be reduced to this conjecture. Its independent resolution status is not given.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Esther Banaian, Kyle Celano, Megan Chang-Lee, Laura Colmenarejo, Owen Goff, Jamie Kimble, Lauren Kimpel, John Lentfer, Jinting Liang and Sheila Sundaram, “The e-positivity of the chromatic symmetric function for twinned paths and cycles”, arXiv:2405.17649 (2024).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2015–2024). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1504.06257.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.