The directed-landscape geodesic upper-tail rate conjecture

At least 1 year old · documented by

Let pipi be the LL-geodesic from (0,0)(0,0) to (0,1)(0,1). For ti(0,1/2]t i (0,1/2], define

ι(t)=−(2t)5/2(9b+4)+6t2(25b+13)−2(2t)3/2(26b+19)−482t+243(3−8t)3(1−t)2t2,\iota(t)=\frac{-(2t)^{5/2} (9 b+4)+6 t^2 (25 b+13)-2(2 t)^{3/2} (26 b+19)-48 \sqrt{2t}+24}{3 \left(3-\sqrt{8t}\right)^3 (1-t)^2 t^2},

where

b=72t2+6(2t)3/2−143t−122t+72(9−8t)t.b=\frac{\sqrt{72 t^2+6 (2t)^{3/2}-143 t-12 \sqrt{2t}+72}}{(9-8 t) \sqrt{t}}.

The directed-landscape geodesic upper-tail rate conjecture. For t∈(0,1/2]t\in (0,1/2], as a→∞a\to\infty,

P(π(t)≥a)=e−ι(t)a3+o(a3).P(\pi(t)\ge a)=e^{-\iota(t) a^3+o(a^3)}.

In particular, as t→0t\to 0,

ι(t)=827/t2+o(1/t2).\iota(t)=\frac8{27}/t^{2}+o(1/t^2).

This conjecture gives the proposed large-deviation rate for a geodesic forced to lie high at time tt; the paper notes that the corresponding heuristic path is not generally piecewise linear when t≠1/2t\ne1/2, but instead involves two linear pieces and a parabola. The optimization leading to the formula is beyond the scope of the paper, and no resolution is supplied.

References

Primary source

Sayan Das, Duncan Dauvergne and Bálint Virág, “Upper tail large deviations of the directed landscape”, arXiv:2405.14924 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.