Pointwise convergence and maximal cone multiplier conjecture

From papers

Let n3n\geq3, p2p\geq2, and define

T~tλ(f)(x)=Rnm~λ(t1ξ,ξn)f^(ξ)e2πixξdξ,\widetilde T_t^\lambda(f)(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\widetilde m^\lambda(t^{-1}\xi',\xi_n)\widehat f(\xi)e^{2\pi i x\cdot\xi}\,d\xi,

where m~λ\widetilde m^\lambda is the cone multiplier. Also define

T~λ(f)(x)=supt>0T~tλ(f)(x).\widetilde T_*^\lambda(f)(x)=\sup_{t>0}|\widetilde T_t^\lambda(f)(x)|.

Pointwise convergence and maximal cone multiplier conjecture. The range of pp for which

limtT~tλ(f)(x)=f(x)a.e.\lim_{t\to\infty}\widetilde T_t^\lambda(f)(x)=f(x)\qquad\text{a.e.}

for every fLp(Rn)f\in L^p(\mathbb{R}^n) is the same as the range for which T~λ\widetilde T^\lambda is bounded on Lp(Rn)L^p(\mathbb{R}^n), namely

λ>max{(n1)1p1212,0}.\lambda>\max\left\{(n-1)\left|\frac1p-\frac12\right|-\frac12,0\right\}.

Moreover, T~λ\widetilde T_*^\lambda is bounded on Lp(Rn)L^p(\mathbb{R}^n) whenever the same inequality holds. This conjecture asks for the sharp pointwise and maximal estimates associated with cone multipliers; the supplied text does not state that it has been resolved.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Peng Chen, Danqing He, Xiaochun Li and Lixin Yan, “On pointwise convergence of cone multipliers”, arXiv:2405.02607 (2024).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.