Pointwise convergence and maximal cone multiplier conjecture

About 2 years old · traced to

Let n≥3n\geq3, p≥2p\geq2, and define

T~tλ(f)(x)=∫Rnm~λ(t−1ξ′,ξn)f^(ξ)e2πix⋅ξ dξ,\widetilde T_t^\lambda(f)(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\widetilde m^\lambda(t^{-1}\xi',\xi_n)\widehat f(\xi)e^{2\pi i x\cdot\xi}\,d\xi,

where m~λ\widetilde m^\lambda is the cone multiplier. Also define

T~∗λ(f)(x)=sup⁡t>0∣T~tλ(f)(x)∣.\widetilde T_*^\lambda(f)(x)=\sup_{t>0}|\widetilde T_t^\lambda(f)(x)|.

Pointwise convergence and maximal cone multiplier conjecture. The range of pp for which

lim⁡t→∞T~tλ(f)(x)=f(x)a.e.\lim_{t\to\infty}\widetilde T_t^\lambda(f)(x)=f(x)\qquad\text{a.e.}

for every f∈Lp(Rn)f\in L^p(\mathbb{R}^n) is the same as the range for which T~λ\widetilde T^\lambda is bounded on Lp(Rn)L^p(\mathbb{R}^n), namely

λ>max⁡{(n−1)∣1p−12∣−12,0}.\lambda>\max\left\{(n-1)\left|\frac1p-\frac12\right|-\frac12,0\right\}.

Moreover, T~∗λ\widetilde T_*^\lambda is bounded on Lp(Rn)L^p(\mathbb{R}^n) whenever the same inequality holds. This conjecture asks for the sharp pointwise and maximal estimates associated with cone multipliers; the supplied text does not state that it has been resolved.

References

Primary source

Peng Chen, Danqing He, Xiaochun Li and Lixin Yan, “On pointwise convergence of cone multipliers”, arXiv:2405.02607 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.