The parametrized Gompf-equivalence conjecture for Cappell–Shaneson matrices

Let

CS={(c,d,n)Z3fn(c)0(modd) and d0}.\mathcal{C}\mathcal{S}=\{(c,d,n)\in\mathbb{Z}^3\mid f_n(c)\equiv0\pmod d\ \text{and}\ d\neq0\}.

The set CS\mathcal{C}\mathcal{S} parametrizes standard Cappell–Shaneson matrices via (c,d,n)Xc,d,n(c,d,n)\mapsto X_{c,d,n}. Let \sim denote Gompf equivalence on CS\mathcal{C}\mathcal{S}, and let (1,1,2)(1,1,2) correspond to A0A_0. The parametrized Gompf-equivalence conjecture. For every (c,d,n)CS(c,d,n)\in\mathcal{C}\mathcal{S},

(c,d,n)(1,1,2).(c,d,n)\sim(1,1,2).

This is a reformulation of Gompf's matrix-equivalence conjecture in the parametrization by triples. The supplied text gives no separate resolution, so the general assertion remains open there.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kazunori Iwaki, “Infinite families of standard Cappell-Shaneson spheres”, arXiv:2404.05096 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.