Nonsplit quantum unique ergodicity conjecture for Bianchi Maaß forms

From papers

Let EE be an imaginary quadratic field of class number 11, let Γ\Gamma be the relevant arithmetic subgroup, and let (ϕj)(\phi_j) be an orthonormal basis of Bianchi Maaß cusp forms on SL2(OE)\H3\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathcal{O}_E)\backslash\mathbb{H}^3, with spectral parameter tjt_j. Restrict ϕj\phi_j from H3\mathbb{H}^3 to Γ\H\Gamma\backslash\mathbb{H} and define the signed measure dμj(z)ϕj(z)dμ(z)d\mu_j(z)\coloneqq\phi_j(z)\,d\mu(z). For HCb(Γ\H)H\in C_b(\Gamma\backslash\mathbb{H}), let Dj(H)\mathcal{D}_j(H) be the discrepancy defined from this signed measure as in the Hilbert case, and set

C(ϕj)(3+tj)4.C(\phi_j)\coloneqq(3+|t_j|)^4.

Nonsplit Bianchi quantum unique ergodicity conjecture. If HCb(Γ\H)H\in C_b(\Gamma\backslash\mathbb{H}) is fixed, then

limC(ϕj)C(ϕj)18Dj(H)=0.\lim_{C(\phi_j)\to\infty}C(\phi_j)^{\frac18}\mathcal{D}_j(H)=0.

This is the imaginary-quadratic, or Bianchi, analogue of the preceding nonsplit conjecture. It predicts quantitative dissipation of the restrictions to the modular surface as the analytic conductor grows, and the statement remains open.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Peter Humphries and Jesse Thorner, “New variants of arithmetic quantum ergodicity”, arXiv:2403.14591 (2025).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.