The stronger density hypothesis for the Riemann zeta function

At least 1 year old · documented by

Let N(σ,T)N(\sigma,T) denote the number of zeros ρ=β+iγ\rho=\beta+i\gamma of the Riemann zeta function with β≥σ\beta\geq\sigma and ∣γ∣≤T|\gamma|\leq T, counted with multiplicity. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0, let δ=δ(ε)∈(0,1)\delta=\delta(\varepsilon)\in(0,1).

Stronger density hypothesis. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0, there exists δ=δ(ε)∈(0,1)\delta=\delta(\varepsilon)\in(0,1) such that, for every ν∈[0,1/2−ε)\nu\in[0,1/2-\varepsilon) and T≥1T\geq1,

N(1−ν,T)≪εT(2−δ)ν.N(1-\nu,T)\ll_{\varepsilon}T^{(2-\delta)\nu}.

This would improve the density hypothesis N(σ,T)≪εT2(1−σ)+εN(\sigma,T)\ll_{\varepsilon}T^{2(1-\sigma)+\varepsilon} in the range relevant to applications, and would yield stronger large-value estimates for Dirichlet polynomials through the results of the paper. Its status is not resolved here.

References

Primary source

Kaisa Matomäki and Joni Teräväinen, “A note on zero density results implying large value estimates for Dirichlet polynomials”, arXiv:2403.13157 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.