The stronger density hypothesis for the Riemann zeta function

Let N(σ,T)N(\sigma,T) denote the number of zeros ρ=β+iγ\rho=\beta+i\gamma of the Riemann zeta function with βσ\beta\geq\sigma and γT|\gamma|\leq T, counted with multiplicity. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0, let δ=δ(ε)(0,1)\delta=\delta(\varepsilon)\in(0,1).

Stronger density hypothesis. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0, there exists δ=δ(ε)(0,1)\delta=\delta(\varepsilon)\in(0,1) such that, for every ν[0,1/2ε)\nu\in[0,1/2-\varepsilon) and T1T\geq1,

N(1ν,T)εT(2δ)ν.N(1-\nu,T)\ll_{\varepsilon}T^{(2-\delta)\nu}.

This would improve the density hypothesis N(σ,T)εT2(1σ)+εN(\sigma,T)\ll_{\varepsilon}T^{2(1-\sigma)+\varepsilon} in the range relevant to applications, and would yield stronger large-value estimates for Dirichlet polynomials through the results of the paper. Its status is not resolved here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kaisa Matomäki and Joni Teräväinen, “A note on zero density results implying large value estimates for Dirichlet polynomials”, arXiv:2403.13157 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.