The sparse Strong Nine Dragon Tree Conjecture

Let kk and dd be positive integers. For a graph GG, call it (k,d)(k,d)-sparse if every subgraph HH satisfies

(k+1)(k+d)v(H)(k+d+1)e(H)k20.(k+1)(k+d)v(H)-(k+d+1)e(H)-k^2\geq 0.

Call a subgraph HH (k+1)(k+1)-overfull if e(H)>(k+1)(v(H)1)e(H)>(k+1)(v(H)-1). Sparse Strong Nine Dragon Tree Conjecture. Every (k,d)(k,d)-sparse graph with no (k+1)(k+1)-overfull subgraph decomposes into k+1k+1 forests such that one forest has every component containing at most dd edges.

This conjecture strengthens the paper’s main theorem, which proves the assertion when d2(k+1)d\leq 2(k+1). It is motivated by the fact that (k,d)(k,d)-sparsity is a relaxed form of the fractional-arboricity inequality, while excluding overfull subgraphs ensures decomposition into k+1k+1 forests.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Sebastian Mies and Benjamin Moore, “The Strong Nine Dragon Tree Conjecture is True for d 2(k+1)”, arXiv:2403.05178 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.