The doubled-prefix conjecture for reduced banned words
The doubled-prefix conjecture for reduced banned words
Let be a scaling factor, and let be the reduced banned words, enumerated in nondecreasing order of length, with . For each , write
A doubled-prefix conjecture asserts that, for every , the concatenation does not contain any with as a subword.
This condition is intended to support the observed recursive pattern in the reduced banned words and the converse of the sufficient condition for an iterated function system to be of finite type. The source says that proving the assertion or finding a counterexample is very difficult; the supplied status evidence marks it as disproved, although no explicit counterexample is provided here.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Grover Lancaster-Cole, Georgiana Lyall, Thomas Malcolm and Qiyu Zhou, “Graph Iterated Function Systems and Fractal Tops”, arXiv:2402.00237 (2024).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.