Conjecture on the smallest positive zero of the Mittag–Leffler function with parameter beta equal to 1

From papers

Let Eα,βE_{\alpha,\beta} denote the Mittag–Leffler function, and let Z1(α)Z_1(\alpha) be the smallest positive zero of zEα,1(zα)z\mapsto E_{\alpha,1}(-z^\alpha).

Smallest-zero conjecture for Eα,1E_{\alpha,1}. For any α(1,2]\alpha\in(1,2], Eα,1(zα)>0E_{\alpha,1}(-z^\alpha)>0 for all z[0,1.559]z\in[0,1.559]. Moreover, as α1+\alpha\to1+,

Z1(α)=(cln(α1)+d)(1+o(1)),Z_1(\alpha)=(c\ln(\alpha-1)+d)(1+o(1)),

with c0.275c\approx-0.275 and d17.54d\approx17.54, while as α2\alpha\to2-,

Z1(α)=π2+c(2α)+o(2α),Z_1(\alpha)=\frac{\pi}{2}+c(2-\alpha)+o(2-\alpha),

with c0.12c\approx-0.12.

The claim is based on numerical calculations and suspected asymptotic behavior shown in the paper's figures. The positivity bound and the two asymptotic expansions, including their numerical coefficients, remain unproved in the supplied text.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Renu Chaudhary, Kai Diethelm and Safoura Hashemishahraki, “On the separation of solutions to fractional differential equations of order α(1,2)”, arXiv:2401.14771 (2024).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.