Conjecture on the smallest positive zero of the Mittag–Leffler function with parameter beta equal to alpha

From papers

Let Eα,βE_{\alpha,\beta} denote the Mittag–Leffler function, and let Zα(α)Z_{\alpha}(\alpha) be the smallest positive zero of zEα,α(zα)z\mapsto E_{\alpha,\alpha}(-z^\alpha).

Smallest-zero conjecture for Eα,αE_{\alpha,\alpha}. For any α(1,2]\alpha\in(1,2], Eα,α(zα)>0E_{\alpha,\alpha}(-z^\alpha)>0 for all z[0,2.93785]z\in[0,2.93785]. Moreover, as α1+\alpha\to1+,

Zα(α)=(cln(α1)+d)(1+o(1)),Z_{\alpha}(\alpha)=(c\ln(\alpha-1)+d)(1+o(1)),

with c0.81c\approx-0.81 and d2.25d\approx2.25, while as α2\alpha\to2-,

Zα(α)=π+c(2α)+o(2α),Z_{\alpha}(\alpha)=\pi+c(2-\alpha)+o(2-\alpha),

with c0.81c\approx-0.81.

These claims are inferred from numerical calculations and asymptotic fits; the two coefficients reported as approximately 0.81-0.81 may or may not be exactly equal, and no proof is provided.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Renu Chaudhary, Kai Diethelm and Safoura Hashemishahraki, “On the separation of solutions to fractional differential equations of order α(1,2)”, arXiv:2401.14771 (2024).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.