Model 2 conjecture on eigenvalue and pseudospectrum structures

Let SδJ(2)(m)S_{\delta J}^{(2)}(m) denote the model 2 matrix, with matrix size nn, parameters δ\delta and aa, and let λ0\lambda_0 be the distinguished eigenvalue of the original system. Let fS^m+aS^m+1(T)f_{\widehat{S}^m+a\widehat{S}^{m+1}}(\mathbb{T}) be the symbol curve, whose outermost closed simple curve and inner part are defined by the observed decomposition of that curve. Model 2 eigenvalue and pseudospectrum conjecture. For model 2, at each time mm, the dots composing the outermost curve in the numerical result are exact eigenvalues of SδJ(2)(m)S_{\delta J}^{(2)}(m). For m2m\geq 2, the inner parts are not exact eigenvalues; they are eigenvalues of the system after uncontrolled computer-rounding perturbations are added. Their distributions represent pseudospectrum containing λ0\lambda_0 and reflect the inner parts of the spectrum of the Toeplitz operator S^m+aS^m1\widehat{S}^m+a\widehat{S}^{m-1}, without the deterministic perturbation by δJ\delta J or uncontrolled rounding perturbations. The size of this pseudospectrum decreases exponentially as mm increases. This conjecture proposes an explanation of numerically observed inner eigenvalue patterns as pseudospectral effects of rounding errors, while identifying the outermost eigenvalues as exact and robust spectral data.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Saori Morimoto, Makoto Katori and Tomoyuki Shirai, “Eigenvalue and pseudospectrum processes generated by nonnormal Toeplitz matrices with rank 1 perturbations”, arXiv:2401.08129 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.