The converse conjecture for symbolic F-thresholds of radical ideals

Let (R,m)(R,\mathfrak{m}) be an FF-finite regular local ring and let II be an unmixed radical ideal. The ideal II is symbolic FF-split when it has the symbolic FF-splitting property, and Cm(I())\mathcal{C}^{\mathfrak{m}}(I^{(\bullet)}) denotes the symbolic FF-threshold of II with respect to m\mathfrak{m}.

Converse conjecture. If II is symbolic FF-split, then

\mathcal{C}^{\mathfrak{m}}(I^{(\bullet)})=\operatorname{\big\text{-}height}(I).

The paper establishes that attaining the big-height bound implies that a radical ideal is unmixed and symbolic FF-split; this conjecture asserts the converse implication. The statement concerns when symbolic FF-splitting characterizes equality in the upper bound for symbolic FF-thresholds.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Mitra Koley and Arvind Kumar, “F-thresholds of filtrations of ideals”, arXiv:2312.07761 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.