The rogue divisor conjecture for Cunningham chains

About 3 years old · traced to

Let P\mathbb{P} denote the primes, let p∈Pp\in\mathbb{P} with p>3p>3, and let Ci[p]C_i[p] be the Cunningham chain associated with pp and index ii. Define

k=2max⁡{Ci[p]}+(−1)i+1.k=2\max\{C_i[p]\}+(-1)^{i+1}.

The rogue divisor conjecture. The least prime divisor of kk is smaller than pp:

min⁡{q∈P:q∣k}<p.\min\{q\in\mathbb{P}:q\mid k\}<p.

Consequently, the preceding upper bound for ∣Ci[p]∣|C_i[p]| holds with equality. The conjecture would also remove the non-emptiness assumption on the relevant rogue-prime set, but it is not proved in the source.

References

Primary source

Anand Bhardwaj, Luisa Degen, Radostin Petkov and Sidney Stanbury, “A Study of Cunningham Bounds through Rogue Primes”, arXiv:2311.13375 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.