The rogue divisor conjecture for Cunningham chains

Let P\mathbb{P} denote the primes, let pPp\in\mathbb{P} with p>3p>3, and let Ci[p]C_i[p] be the Cunningham chain associated with pp and index ii. Define

k=2max{Ci[p]}+(1)i+1.k=2\max\{C_i[p]\}+(-1)^{i+1}.

The rogue divisor conjecture. The least prime divisor of kk is smaller than pp:

min{qP:qk}<p.\min\{q\in\mathbb{P}:q\mid k\}<p.

Consequently, the preceding upper bound for Ci[p]|C_i[p]| holds with equality. The conjecture would also remove the non-emptiness assumption on the relevant rogue-prime set, but it is not proved in the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Anand Bhardwaj, Luisa Degen, Radostin Petkov and Sidney Stanbury, “A Study of Cunningham Bounds through Rogue Primes”, arXiv:2311.13375 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.