The W-state signature conjecture for Lifshitz transitions

Let LL be the system size, let XiX_i denote the local operator creating the one-excitation component at site ii, and let α|\alpha\rangle be a single-site product state. A zero-mode W1|W_1\rangle-like state has the form

1Liei2πLmxiXiαL,\frac{1}{\sqrt{L}}\sum_i e^{i \frac{2\pi}{L}m x_i}X_i|\alpha\rangle^{\otimes L},

where mZm\in\mathbb{Z}, and the Hamiltonian is translation invariant.

The W-state signature conjecture. If such a translation-invariant Hamiltonian is tuned so that the zero-mode W1|W_1\rangle-like state and the product state αL|\alpha\rangle^{\otimes L} become ground states, then the system is at a Lifshitz transition.

This proposed signature covers simple Lifshitz transitions, such as transitions between an insulator and a metal, and is consistent with the occurrence of quadratic or higher dispersion at the critical point. It does not cover cases in which a metal or semimetal changes its Fermi-surface shape through a Van Hove singularity or Dirac lines; the authors leave a precise formulation for such cases open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Lei Gioia and Ryan Thorngren, “W state is not the unique ground state of any local Hamiltonian”, arXiv:2310.10716 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.