The set-uniform Vinogradov mean value conjecture

About 3 years old · traced to

Let A⊆ZA \subseteq \mathbb{Z} be a finite set. For s,k∈Ns,k \in \mathbb{N}, let Js,k(A)J_{s,k}(A) denote the number of solutions (x1,…,x2s)∈A2s(x_1,\ldots,x_{2s})\in A^{2s} to

∑i=1s(xij−xi+sj)=0(1≤j≤k).\sum_{i=1}^{s}(x_i^j-x_{i+s}^j)=0 \qquad (1\leq j\leq k).

Set-uniform Vinogradov mean value conjecture. For every real number ϵ>0\epsilon>0,

Js,k(A)≪s,k,ϵ∣A∣ϵ(∣A∣s+∣A∣2s−k(k+1)/2).J_{s,k}(A) \ll_{s,k,\epsilon} |A|^{\epsilon}\left(|A|^s+|A|^{2s-k(k+1)/2}\right).

This conjecture would replace the known factor NϵN^{\epsilon} in the corresponding bound for sets A⊆[N]A\subseteq[N] by the intrinsic factor ∣A∣ϵ|A|^{\epsilon}. The k=1k=1 case is trivial, but even the k=2k=2 case remains open according to the source.

References

Primary source

Samuel Mansfield and Akshat Mudgal, “A Quadratic Vinogradov Mean Value Theorem in Finite Fields”, arXiv:2310.02950 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.