Bruhat-order characterization for affine Weyl groups of type A

From papers

Let (λ1,w1)(\lambda_1,w_1) and (λ2,w2)(\lambda_2,w_2) be elements of the affine Weyl group written in semidirect-product form, where λ1\lambda_1 and λ2\lambda_2 lie in the root lattice and w1w_1 and w2w_2 lie in the finite Weyl group. For each weight λ\lambda, let λ+\lambda^+ denote the unique dominant weight in its finite Weyl-group orbit, and set ϖ0=0\varpi_0=0. Bruhat-order characterization. The relation (λ1,w1)(λ2,w2)(\lambda_1,w_1)\leq(\lambda_2,w_2) in Bruhat order holds if and only if

(λ1ϖi+w1(ϖj))+(λ2ϖi+w2(ϖj))+(\lambda_1-\varpi_i+w_1(\varpi_j))^+\leq(\lambda_2-\varpi_i+w_2(\varpi_j))^+

in the dominance order for all 0i,jn0\leq i,j\leq n. This gives a proposed criterion for comparing affine Weyl-group elements using only dominant representatives of the indicated weights; the supplied text does not state whether the criterion has been proved or remains open.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Federico Castillo, Damian de la Fuente, Nicolas Libedinsky and David Plaza, “On the size of Bruhat intervals”, arXiv:2309.08539 (2023).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.