The alternating Euler-sum permutation conjecture for unramified motivic sums

From papers

Let aN0a\in\mathbb{N}_0, N\ell\in\mathbb{N}, and let uj,vjX:={1,2ˉ,3,4ˉ,}u_j,v_j\in X:=\{1,\bar2,3,\bar4,\dots\} for j=1,,j=1,\dots,\ell, with

1{uj:1j} ⁣{vj:1j}.1\notin\{u_j:1\leq j\leq\ell\}\displaystyle\!\cap\{v_j:1\leq j\leq\ell\}.

For S\mathfrak S_\ell the symmetric group on \ell letters, the motivic Euler sums ζa\fm()\zeta_a^\fm(\cdots) are understood in the notation of the paper. The unramified permutation-sum conjecture. Both sums

 ⁣σ,τSζa\fm(uσ(1),vτ(1),,uσ(),vτ())\displaystyle\!\sum_{\sigma,\tau\in\mathfrak S_\ell}\zeta_a^\fm(u_{\sigma(1)},v_{\tau(1)},\dots,u_{\sigma(\ell)},v_{\tau(\ell)})

and

 ⁣σS,τS1ζa\fm(uσ(1),vτ(1),,vτ(1),uσ())\displaystyle\!\sum_{\sigma\in\mathfrak S_\ell,\,\tau\in\mathfrak S_{\ell-1}}\zeta_a^\fm(u_{\sigma(1)},v_{\tau(1)},\dots,v_{\tau(\ell-1)},u_{\sigma(\ell)})

are unramified. For a=0a=0, applying the period map reduces this to a conjecture of M. Hirose and N. Sato; the stated motivic families extend the preceding proved unramified families, but the general assertion remains open.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ce Xu and Jianqiang Zhao, “On Some Unramified Families of Motivic Euler Sums”, arXiv:2309.06925 (2024).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.