Twisted Gan–Gross–Prasad nonvanishing conjecture for unitary theta periods

Let E/FE/F be a quadratic extension of number fields, let VV be an nn-dimensional skew-Hermitian space over EE, and let \U(V)\U(V) be its unitary group. Let π\pi be an irreducible cuspidal automorphic representation of GLn(AE)\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb A_E), and let (φ,ϕ)\P(\varphi,\phi) be the global period pairing πωψ,μ\pi\otimes\overline{\omega_{\psi',\mu}} defined using the theta series attached to the Weil representation ωψ,μ\omega_{\psi',\mu}. For each place vv of FF, write πv\pi_v and ωψv,μv\omega_{\psi'_v,\mu_v} for the corresponding local representations. Twisted Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture. The period integral (φ,ϕ)\P(\varphi,\phi) is not identically zero if and only if

Hom\U(V)(Fv)(πvωψv,μv,C)0\operatorname{Hom}_{\U(V)(F_v)}\bigl(\pi_v\otimes\overline{\omega_{\psi'_v,\mu_v}},\mathbb C\bigr)\neq 0

for every place vv of FF and

L(12,π×σ ⁣πμ1)0.L\left(\frac12,\pi\times{}^{\sigma}\!\pi^\vee\otimes\mu^{-1}\right)\neq 0.

Furthermore, if the central LL-value is nonzero, then there exists a unique skew-Hermitian space VV of dimension nn over EE such that \P is nonzero. This is the global twisted Gan–Gross–Prasad criterion relating local Hom-space nonvanishing and the central Rankin–Selberg LL-value; the source presents it as a conjectural statement and does not provide a resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Danielle Wang, “Twisted Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for unramified quadratic extensions”, arXiv:2307.15234 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.