Spectral-flow and quantum-Hamiltonian-reduction conjecture for admissible modules

Let PrZk\mathrm{Pr}_{\mathbb{Z}}^k be the specified set of integral principal admissible weights, let SθS_\theta denote spectral flow, let Lk(λ)\mathbf{L}_k(\lambda) be the corresponding WkD+(n,1)\mathcal{W}_k^{D^+}(n,1)-module, and let Hf0(Lk(μ))H_f^0(L_k(\mu)) denote quantum Hamiltonian reduction. Let ς\varsigma be the involution determined by

SqˉLk(λ)Lk(ςλ).S_{\bar q}\mathbf{L}_k(\lambda)\simeq\mathbf{L}_k(\varsigma\circ\lambda).

Spectral-flow conjecture. For every λPrZk\lambda\in\mathrm{Pr}_{\mathbb{Z}}^k and 0θqˉ0\leq\theta\leq\bar q, there exists μh\mu\in\mathfrak{h}^* such that

SθLk(λ)Hf0(Lk(μ)).S_\theta\mathbf{L}_k(\lambda)\simeq H_f^0(L_k(\mu)).

Moreover, ς=σ\varsigma=\sigma, equivalently

SqˉLk(λ)Lk(σλ).S_{\bar q}\mathbf{L}_k(\lambda)\simeq\mathbf{L}_k(\sigma\circ\lambda).

The surrounding results establish periodicity and the existence of an involution, while the asserted identification with σ\sigma and the reduction description are left as conjectural in the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Justine Fasquel and Shigenori Nakatsuka, “Orthosymplectic Feigin-Semikhatov duality”, arXiv:2307.14574 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.