The DLIH and BDL conjecture for generic generators

From papers

Let obreakADR obreak\textsf{AD}_{\mathbb R} denote determinacy for real games. Suppose that for every set BRB\subseteq\mathbb R there is a function FF as in Theorem n*x such that FF is not pe-bad and BΔ~Base(F)B\in\widetilde\Delta_{\operatorname{Base}(F)}. In the pure extender version, assume obreakLEC obreak\textsf{LEC} fails and set obreakΔ=Δgen,pe obreak\Delta=\Delta_{\mathrm{gen},\mathrm{pe}}; in the hod-pair version, assume obreakHPC obreak\textsf{HPC} fails and set obreakΔ=Δgen,hp obreak\Delta=\Delta_{\mathrm{gen},\mathrm{hp}}. DLIH and BDL conjecture. In either version, both obreakDLIH(Δ) obreak\textsf{DLIH}(\Delta) and obreakBDL(Δ) obreak\textsf{BDL}(\Delta) hold. The paper notes that this follows assuming obreakNWLW obreak\textsf{NWLW}, while the unconditional comparison theorem needed for the conjecture remains to be proved.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Grigor Sargsyan, “Generic Generators”, arXiv:2307.00109 (2025).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.