The DLIH and BDL conjecture for generic generators

About 3 years old · traced to

Let obreakADR obreak\textsf{AD}_{\mathbb R} denote determinacy for real games. Suppose that for every set B⊆RB\subseteq\mathbb R there is a function FF as in Theorem n*x such that FF is not pe-bad and B∈Δ~Base⁡(F)B\in\widetilde\Delta_{\operatorname{Base}(F)}. In the pure extender version, assume obreakLEC obreak\textsf{LEC} fails and set obreakΔ=Δgen,pe obreak\Delta=\Delta_{\mathrm{gen},\mathrm{pe}}; in the hod-pair version, assume obreakHPC obreak\textsf{HPC} fails and set obreakΔ=Δgen,hp obreak\Delta=\Delta_{\mathrm{gen},\mathrm{hp}}. DLIH and BDL conjecture. In either version, both obreakDLIH(Δ) obreak\textsf{DLIH}(\Delta) and obreakBDL(Δ) obreak\textsf{BDL}(\Delta) hold. The paper notes that this follows assuming obreakNWLW obreak\textsf{NWLW}, while the unconditional comparison theorem needed for the conjecture remains to be proved.

References

Primary source

Grigor Sargsyan, “Generic Generators”, arXiv:2307.00109 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.