Non-conservatism of the graph hierarchy for robust feedback stabilization

Let MZ+M\in\mathbb{Z}^{+} and let

F={(Ai,Bi)Rn×n×Rn×mi{1,,M}}.\mathcal{F}=\{(A_i,B_i)\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n\times m}\mid i\in\{1,\ldots,M\}\}.

Suppose that the switched system under consideration is robust feedback stabilizable. Non-conservatism conjecture. There exists an lNl\in\mathbb{N}, sufficiently large, such that the conditions in the stated corollary based on the graph Hl(M)\mathcal{H}^{l}(M) are feasible. The claim asks whether increasing the graph order eventually removes the conservatism of the sufficient conditions for robust feedback stabilization; the corresponding hierarchy is known to be non-conservative for the stability problem, whereas this robust stabilization question remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Matteo Della Rossa, Thiago Alves Lima, Marc Jungers and Raphaël M. Jungers, “Graph-Based Conditions for Feedback Stabilization of Switched and LPV Systems”, arXiv:2306.11548 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.