Grothendieck limit-shape conjecture in the large negative-beta regime

At least 2 years old · documented by

Let x,y↘0x,y\searrow 0 and let β=β(y)=−K/y\beta=\beta(y)=-K/y, with fixed K>0K>0. Let W(u∣x,y,β(y))\mathfrak{W}(u\mid x,y,\beta(y)) be the Grothendieck limit shape, and let Ω\Omega be the Vershik–Kerov–Logan–Shepp shape. Large negative-beta Grothendieck conjecture. There exists K0>0K_0>0 such that, for all K>K0K>K_0, in the O( ⁣xy ⁣)O(\!\sqrt{xy}\!)-neighborhood of u=1u=1, the curve W(u∣x,y,β(y))\mathfrak{W}(u\mid x,y,\beta(y)) is close to

u+12+xy2Ω(K)(u−1xy),\frac{u+1}{2}+\frac{\sqrt{xy}}{2}\Omega_{(K)}\left(\frac{u-1}{\sqrt{xy}}\right),

where Ω(K)\Omega_{(K)} is a suitable KK-dependent deformation of Ω\Omega; the source further expects that as K→−∞K\to-\infty, the shapes Ω(K)\Omega_{(K)} approach Ω\Omega. This conjecture concerns the Plancherel-like curved part observed near the frozen staircase facet, and is supported by numerical experimentation.

References

Primary source

Svetlana Gavrilova and Leonid Petrov, “Tilted biorthogonal ensembles, Grothendieck random partitions, and determinantal tests”, arXiv:2305.17747 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.