Grothendieck limit-shape conjecture in the large negative-beta regime

From papers

Let x,y0x,y\searrow 0 and let β=β(y)=K/y\beta=\beta(y)=-K/y, with fixed K>0K>0. Let W(ux,y,β(y))\mathfrak{W}(u\mid x,y,\beta(y)) be the Grothendieck limit shape, and let Ω\Omega be the Vershik–Kerov–Logan–Shepp shape. Large negative-beta Grothendieck conjecture. There exists K0>0K_0>0 such that, for all K>K0K>K_0, in the O( ⁣xy ⁣)O(\!\sqrt{xy}\!)-neighborhood of u=1u=1, the curve W(ux,y,β(y))\mathfrak{W}(u\mid x,y,\beta(y)) is close to

u+12+xy2Ω(K)(u1xy),\frac{u+1}{2}+\frac{\sqrt{xy}}{2}\Omega_{(K)}\left(\frac{u-1}{\sqrt{xy}}\right),

where Ω(K)\Omega_{(K)} is a suitable KK-dependent deformation of Ω\Omega; the source further expects that as KK\to-\infty, the shapes Ω(K)\Omega_{(K)} approach Ω\Omega. This conjecture concerns the Plancherel-like curved part observed near the frozen staircase facet, and is supported by numerical experimentation.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Svetlana Gavrilova and Leonid Petrov, “Tilted biorthogonal ensembles, Grothendieck random partitions, and determinantal tests”, arXiv:2305.17747 (2024).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.