Conjectured mesoscopic asymptotics for the inverse Kasteleyn matrix

From papers

Let xWε1x \in \mathtt{W}_{\varepsilon_1} and yBε2y \in \mathtt{B}_{\varepsilon_2} with ε1,ε20,1\varepsilon_1,\varepsilon_2 \in \\{0,1\\}. Let K0(α)K_0(\alpha) and K1(α)K_1(\alpha) denote modified Bessel functions of the second kind, and let ζ(x,y)\zeta(x,y), Σ(x,y)\Sigma(x,y), and the asymptotic coordinates αx,αy\alpha_x,\alpha_y be as defined in the source. Let I0,I1,I2,I3,I4I_0,I_1,I_2,I_3,I_4 and ψ\psi be the integrals and combination specified there. The inverse-Kasteleyn asymptotics conjecture. In the limit mm\to\infty with a=1Bm1/2a=1-Bm^{-1/2} and αxαy\alpha_x\ne\alpha_y, the entries Ka1(x,y)K_a^{-1}(x,y) satisfy the two displayed asymptotic formulas in the source: for 1/2αx,αy<0-1/\sqrt{2}\leq\alpha_x,\alpha_y<0, the formula involving K0K_0, K1K_1, and ψ\psi, and for the stated region with a coordinate below 1/2-1/\sqrt{2}, the formula involving K0K_0, K1K_1, I0I_0, and ψ\psi, with error o(m1/2)o(m^{-1/2}). These formulas describe the two-point correlation kernel in the mesoscopic limit of the two-periodic weighted Aztec diamond. They are conjectural because the paper does not provide a proof of the stated asymptotics.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Emily Bain, “A numerical study of two-point correlation functions of the two-periodic weighted Aztec diamond in mesoscopic limit”, arXiv:2304.09393 (2023).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.