Fundamental decoupling identity for generalized color orderings

About 3 years old · traced to

Let COk,nCO_{k,n} denote the set of generalized color orderings of type (k,n)(k,n). A triple T=(Σ0,Σ1,Σ2)\mathcal{T}=(\Sigma_0,\Sigma_1,\Sigma_2), with

Σ0∈COk−1,n−2,Σ1∈COk−1,n−1,Σ2∈COk,n−1,\Sigma_0\in CO_{k-1,n-2},\qquad \Sigma_1\in CO_{k-1,n-1},\qquad \Sigma_2\in CO_{k,n-1},

is fundamental when πi(Σ1)=π(j)(Σ2)=Σ0\pi_i(\Sigma_1)=\pi_{(j)}(\Sigma_2)=\Sigma_0. A generalized color ordering Σ∈COk,n\Sigma\in CO_{k,n} is a double T\mathcal{T}-extension of Σ0\Sigma_0 when π(i)(Σ)=Σ1\pi_{(i)}(\Sigma)=\Sigma_1 and πj(Σ)=Σ2\pi_j(\Sigma)=\Sigma_2 for some i≠ji\ne j.

Fundamental decoupling identity. Fix a fundamental triple T=(Σ0,Σ1,Σ2)\mathcal{T}=(\Sigma_0,\Sigma_1,\Sigma_2). As Σ∈CO(k,n)\Sigma\in CO(k,n) ranges over all double T\mathcal{T}-extensions Σ\Sigma, the CEGM integrands I(Σ)\mathcal{I}(\Sigma) satisfy a unique linear identity whose coefficients are all ±1\pm1.

This identity is proposed as a refinement compatible with the duality between the configuration spaces X(k,n)X(k,n) and X(n−k,n)X(n-k,n), and is called a fundamental decoupling identity. The supplied text does not establish whether the asserted uniqueness and coefficient condition have been proved, so the status remains open.

References

Primary source

Freddy Cachazo, Nick Early and Yong Zhang, “Generalized Color Orderings: CEGM Integrands and Decoupling Identities”, arXiv:2304.07351 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.