Factorization conjecture for the determinant of the Painlevé coefficient matrix
Factorization conjecture for the determinant of the Painlevé coefficient matrix
Let , let be algebraically independent variables, and let be the matrix introduced in the paper. Regard as a polynomial in over . Determinant-factorization conjecture. The polynomial is always reducible over , with the number of factors equal to the number of divisors of , including and ; one factor is a polynomial in of degree . The examples and partial calculations support this factorization pattern, but no proof or general resolution is given in the supplied text.
Progress summary
No public discussion or published progress on this conjecture was found.
No public discussion or published progress was found.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture remains open, with no recorded proof, counterexample, or verified progress.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
A. V. Kitaev and A. Vartanian, “Algebroid Solutions of the Degenerate Third Painlevé Equation for Vanishing Formal Monodromy Parameter”, arXiv:2304.05671 (2023).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
In fact, there is an explicit complete irreducible factorization for every .
Let
and define the source's coefficient matrix by
Choose a primitive th root of unity , let , and put . Define
For every divisor of , put
and put
Then
where every belongs to , is irreducible there, and the factors are pairwise nonassociate. Moreover,
To prove the factorization, work over
and introduce
Evaluation at the roots of gives . The two Vandermonde determinants yield
which is the asserted product after grouping unordered pairs by the order of .
The splitting-field Galois group is
acting by
It acts transitively on the roots , and separately transitively on each set of unordered pairs with fixed ratio order . Such a set has
pairs. The orbit products are therefore Galois invariant. Their coefficients belong initially to ; invariance under leaves only powers of , and invariance under then gives coefficients in .
The linear factors are pairwise nonassociate because their -coefficients equal , while their -coefficients are the distinct . Transitivity therefore makes irreducible over .
Likewise, each is linear in and has -coefficient . For , its next two coefficients are
These recover the unordered pair , so all the linear factors are distinct. For , the sum already determines the omitted third root. Thus transitivity of each pair orbit makes every irreducible over .
Finally, contains with coefficient , and contains
with coefficient . Hence all the factors are primitive over the UFD , and Gauss's lemma upgrades their irreducibility to
Distinct divisor orbits give distinct factors, while is distinguished by its dependence on .
The -degree of is , with leading term
For , each divided-difference factor has nonzero highest -degree , and there are such factors. Since ,
Therefore has exactly irreducible factors for every , including the required factor of -degree .