The admissible-function convex-hull conjecture for SU(N)SU(N)

Let N2N\geq 2, set k=N(N1)2k=\frac{N(N-1)}{2} and l=N(N+1)21l=\frac{N(N+1)}{2}-1, and let SS^* denote the relevant multiplicative parameter space. A SU(N)SU(N)-admissible function is a function

f:[0,1]k×(S)lCf:[0,1]^k\times(S^*)^l\rightarrow{\mathbb{C}}

with finite expansion f(x,z)=mcm(x)zmf(x,z)=\sum_{\vec m}c_{\vec m}(x)z^{\vec m}, where the exponents have components in j=1N1jZ\bigcup_{j=1}^N\frac1j\mathbb{Z} and the coefficients are complex polynomials in the variables xix_i and 1xi2\sqrt{1-x_i^2}. Let Sp(f)\mathrm{Sp}(f) be the set of exponent multi-indices with nonzero coefficient. SU(N)SU(N) admissible-function conjecture. If

[0,1]k(S)lfPJSU(N)=0\int_{[0,1]^k}\int_{(S^*)^l}f^P J_{SU(N)}=0

for every PNP\in{\mathbb{N}}, then 0\vec 0 does not lie in the convex hull of Sp(f)\mathrm{Sp}(f). This is proposed as a complex-analytic reduction of Mathieu's conjecture for SU(N)SU(N); its status is not resolved by the supplied text.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kevin Zwart, “On the Mathieu Conjecture for SU(N) and SO(N)”, arXiv:2304.02648 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.