Lamm's equivariant crossing number conjecture for two-bridge knots

From papers

Let KK be a two-bridge knot, and let c(K)c(K) denote its crossing number. A symmetric diagram for a strongly invertible knot is a transvergent diagram whose axis is a straight line in the plane of the diagram and which is unchanged under a half-rotation about that axis. The equivariant crossing number ct(K)c_t(K) is the minimum crossing number among all symmetric diagrams for KK. A continued fraction expansion [a1,,an][a_1,\ldots,a_n] is of type (A) when all aia_i are positive, nn is even, and a2,a4,,ana_2,a_4,\ldots,a_n are all even. It is of type (B) when all aia_i are positive, nn is odd, the integers are palindromic with a1=an,a2=an1,a_1=a_n,a_2=a_{n-1},\ldots, and the central integer a(n+1)/2a_{(n+1)/2} is odd.

Lamm's conjecture. ct(K)=c(K)c_t(K)=c(K) if and only if KK can be represented by a continued fraction expansion [a1,,an][a_1,\ldots,a_n] of type (A) or type (B).

The conjecture characterizes precisely when a two-bridge knot admits a symmetric diagram realizing its ordinary crossing number. The paper studies this question through the restricted invariant c2(K)c_2(K) and reports computations up to 14 crossings, but the conjecture is presented as an unresolved claim.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jundai Nanasawa, “Equivariant crossing numbers for two-bridge knots”, arXiv:2304.00540 (2023).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.