Drinfeld's Grothendieck–Teichmüller conjecture for the motivic Galois group

About 3 years old · traced to

Let MTM(Z)\mathcal{MTM}(\mathbb{Z}) be the Tannakian category of mixed Tate motives over Z\mathbb{Z}, and let G1=Gm⋉U1\mathcal{G}_{1}=\mathbb{G}_{m}\ltimes\mathcal{U}_{1} be its motivic Galois group, with prounipotent part U1\mathcal{U}_{1}. The map λ1:U1→exp⁡t3,10\lambda_{1}:\mathcal{U}_{1}\to\exp\mathfrak{t}_{3,1}^{0} identifies the motivic Galois group with a subgroup of the prounipotent Grothendieck–Teichmüller group GRT1⊂exp⁡t3,10\mathrm{GRT}_{1}\subset\exp\mathfrak{t}_{3,1}^{0}. Drinfeld's Grothendieck–Teichmüller conjecture.

im⁡(λ1)=GRT1.\operatorname{im}(\lambda_{1})=\mathrm{GRT}_{1}.

The conjecture asserts that the motivic Galois action on the motivic fundamental torsor of paths on P1∖{0,1,∞}\mathbb{P}^{1}\setminus\{0,1,\infty\} is governed exactly by the prounipotent Grothendieck–Teichmüller group. Brown proved that λ1\lambda_{1} is injective, but equality with GRT1\mathrm{GRT}_{1} remains open.

References

Primary source

Minoru Hirose, “The cyclotomic Grothendieck-Teichmüller group and the motivic Galois group”, arXiv:2301.04064 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.