The genus-zero log-open correspondence for nef Looijenga pairs

Let (X,D)(X,D) be a nef log Calabi–Yau surface pair with D=D1++DlD=D_1+\cdots+D_l, and let (Y,L)(Y,L) be the associated toric Calabi–Yau threefold with framed Aganagic–Vafa branes Li[fi]L_i^{[f_i]} for i<li<l. Let ι\iota be the canonical identification of the relevant curve and relative homology classes, and let O0,ι(d)O_{0,\iota(d)} denote the corresponding genus-zero open invariant. The genus-zero log-open correspondence.

N0,dloc(X,D1++Dl)=O0,ι(d)(Y,L1[f1]Ll1[fl1]).N_{0,d}^{\rm loc}(X,D_1 +\dots + D_l) =O_{0, \iota(d)}(Y,L_1^{[f_1]} \sqcup \dots \sqcup L_{l-1}^{[f_{l-1}]}).

The statement identifies local surface invariants with open Gromov–Witten invariants of the associated toric Calabi–Yau geometry. In the source it is presented as the expected general correspondence for l>1l>1, so its general validity remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Andrea Brini, “Enumerative geometry of surfaces and topological strings”, arXiv:2211.11037 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.