Cambie–Cranston list-packing conjecture
Cambie–Cranston list-packing conjecture
For a graph , let denote its list-chromatic number and let denote its list packing number, the least such that every -assignment admits a proper -packing of size . Cambie–Cranston's conjecture. There exists an absolute constant such that, for every graph ,
This conjecture, cited from Cambie et al., would show that list packing and list coloring are comparable up to a universal multiplicative constant; the source excerpt gives no resolution evidence.
References
Primary source
Hemanshu Kaul, Rogers Mathew, Jeffrey A. Mudrock and Michael J. Pelsmajer, “Flexible list colorings: Maximizing the number of requests satisfied”, arXiv:2211.09048 (2024).
Progress summary
No proof or counterexample has been found publicly; only results for special classes of graphs and related counting questions are known.
The conjecture asks whether list packing and list coloring are always within a universal constant factor. The broader linear-comparability question is explicitly recorded as open, with no source reporting a proof or counterexample for the stated conjecture.
Known results
- For planar graphs, ; for girth at least , ; and for girth at least , (January 2024).
- For planar graphs, triangle-free planar graphs, and planar graphs of girth at least , corresponding counting results strengthen these restricted-family bounds.
- For a graph with vertices and edges, list-packing and ordinary packing functions agree when ; trees satisfy equality when .
January 2024–2024 partial progress
The planar results advance a problem attributed to Cambie, Cames van Batenburg, Davies, and Kang, but do not establish a universal constant. A later survey records the sharper unresolved targets for some graph and for every graph.
Current status (as of August 2026): The universal-constant conjecture remains open; restricted planar-family bounds and related counting results are known, but no proof or counterexample has been reported.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.
This conjecture first appeared as Conjecture 1 in https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.21181, a paper by Cambie, Cames van Batenburg, Davies and Kang.
I have no idea why this website calls it the Cambie-Cranston conjecture. Daniel Cranston has co-authored two papers on the list packing number of planar graphs, but not about this conjecture.