Non-degeneracy conjecture for the Gillet–Soulé height pairing
Non-degeneracy conjecture for the Gillet–Soulé height pairing
Let be a number field and let H^1_\operatorname{mot}(K,\mathcal{M})_\infty=H^1_\operatorname{mot}(K,\mathcal{M})\otimes_FF_\infty. The Gillet–Soulé height pairing is the -bilinear map
\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{\operatorname{GS},\infty}:H^1_\operatorname{mot}(K,\mathcal{M})_\infty\times H^1_\operatorname{mot}(K,\mathcal{M})_\infty\longrightarrow F_\infty.Height non-degeneracy conjecture. The pairing is non-degenerate. The conjecture is motivated by arithmetic analogues of the standard conjectures and by conjectures of Beilinson and Bloch on height pairings.
Equivalent formulations 1
Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.
Non-degeneracy conjecture for the Gillet–Soulé height pairing
Let be the motive associated with the modular form, and let be its motivic cohomology. For a fixed -basis , let denote the determinant of the Gillet–Soulé height pairing.
Gillet–Soulé non-degeneracy conjecture. The Gillet–Soulé height pairing is non-degenerate.
This is one of the three conjectural inputs assumed before the paper's final fractional-ideal formula. The excerpt gives no resolution status.
source: Enrico Da Ronche, “Kolyvagin's conjecture for modular forms at non-ordinary primes”, arXiv:2503.09955 (2025).
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Matteo Longo and Stefano Vigni, “The Tamagawa number conjecture and Kolyvagin's conjecture for motives of modular forms”, arXiv:2211.04907 (2023).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.