Trinh's unipotent-variety twisting conjecture

About 4 years old · traced to

Let GG be a complex, connected, reductive algebraic group, let B+B_+ and B−B_- be opposed Borel subgroups, and let U+U_+ and U−U_- be their unipotent radicals. Let U⊆G\mathcal{U}\subseteq G be the variety of unipotent elements, and define

Φ:U+U−⟶U,Φ(x+x−)=x+x−x+−1.\Phi:U_+U_-\longrightarrow\mathcal{U},\qquad \Phi(x_+x_-)=x_+x_-x_+^{-1}.

For g∈G(C)g\in G(\mathbf{C}), set

Ug=U∩gB+,Vg=U+U−∩gB+,\mathcal{U}_g=\mathcal{U}\cap gB_+,\qquad \mathcal{V}_g=U_+U_-\cap gB_+,

and let Φg:Vg→Ug\Phi_g:\mathcal{V}_g\to\mathcal{U}_g be the restricted map. Trinh's unipotent-variety twisting conjecture. The map Φg\Phi_g defines half of a homotopy equivalence between Ug(C)\mathcal{U}_g(\mathbf{C}) and Vg(C)\mathcal{V}_g(\mathbf{C}). This would imply a weight-preserving isomorphism between their compactly supported cohomologies. The conjecture is proposed as the central geometric idea of the paper; the source also proves an equivariant analogue in type AA, but does not establish the general homotopy-equivalence claim.

References

Primary source

Minh-Tâm Quang Trinh, “Unipotent Elements and Twisting in Link Homology”, arXiv:2210.09051 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.