The determinantal-ring conjecture on n-sem dualizing modules

About 4 years old · traced to

Let XX be an m×nm \times n matrix of indeterminates over a field k\mathsf{k}, and let R=Rt(X)R=R_t(X) be the determinantal ring associated to the ideal of t×tt\times t minors, where t⩽min⁡(m,n)t\leqslant\min(m,n). Let Cl⁡(R)\operatorname{Cl}(R) denote the divisor class group, and let S0i(R)\mathfrak{S}_0^i(R) denote the isomorphism classes of exactly ii-semidualizing modules.

The determinantal-ring conjecture. If 0≠[M]∈Cl⁡(R)0\neq[M]\in\operatorname{Cl}(R), then MM is exactly (m+n−2t+1)(m+n-2t+1)-semidualizing. Hence

S0m+n−2t+1(R)=Cl⁡(R).\mathfrak{S}_0^{m+n-2t+1}(R)=\operatorname{Cl}(R).

In particular, if t=2t=2 and d=dim⁡R=m+n−1d=\dim R=m+n-1, then

S0d−2(R)=Cl⁡(R).\mathfrak{S}_0^{d-2}(R)=\operatorname{Cl}(R).

This extends the paper's results on semidualizing modules over determinantal rings and predicts that all nonzero divisor-class-group elements arise at the indicated semidualizing level. The supplied text does not establish the general assertion or provide a resolution status beyond identifying it as a conjecture.

References

Primary source

Tony Se, “Some properties of n-semidualizing modules”, arXiv:2210.00711 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.