Goldfeld–Hinkle pole-free continuation conjecture for the cubic Pell equation L-function

From papers

Fix ε>0\varepsilon > 0 and let d>1d>1 be a cubefree rational integer. Let Ld(s)L_d(s) denote the cubic Pell equation LL-function.

Goldfeld–Hinkle's pole-free continuation conjecture. The function Ld(s)L_d(s) has meromorphic continuation to Re(s)>12\textup{Re}(s)>\frac12 with at most a simple pole at s=23s=\frac23. In the region Re(s)>12+ε\textup{Re}(s)>\frac12+\varepsilon and s23>ε\left|s-\frac23\right|>\varepsilon, it satisfies

Ld(s)d,εs72.L_d(s) \ll_{d,\varepsilon} |s|^{\frac72}.

This is the conjectural consequence of the asserted nonvanishing of the Appell hypergeometric factor in the preceding theorem. It is a restatement of the preceding pole conjecture together with the already established growth estimate, rather than a separate mathematical claim.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Dorian Goldfeld and Gerhardt Hinkle, “The cubic Pell equation L-function”, arXiv:2209.11874 (2023).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.