Equality of rational blowdown depth and combinatorial depth

From papers

Let Wp,q(n)W_{p,q}(\mathbf{n}) denote the minimal symplectic filling of (L(p,q),ξcan)(L(p,q),\xi_{can}) corresponding to n=(n1,,nk)\mathbf{n}=(n_1,\ldots,n_k) in the parameterizing set Zk(ppq)\mathcal{Z}_k(\frac{p}{p-q}). For k3k\geq 3, define dpt(n)\operatorname{dpt}(\mathbf{n}) to be the number of entries equal to 11 in the interior of n\mathbf{n}:

dpt(n)={i1<i<k and ni=1}.\operatorname{dpt}(\mathbf{n})=\left|\{i\mid 1<i<k\text{ and }n_i=1\}\right|.

The rational blowdown depth conjecture. The rational blowdown depth of Wp,q(n)W_{p,q}(\mathbf{n}) is equal to dpt(n)\operatorname{dpt}(\mathbf{n}).

The preceding result gives only the upper bound by dpt(n)\operatorname{dpt}(\mathbf{n}); the conjecture asserts that this bound is always sharp, so the minimum number of successive symplectic rational blowdowns needed to obtain the filling from the minimal resolution is determined by the interior entries equal to 11.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Mohan Bhupal and Burak Ozbagci, “Rational blowdown graphs for symplectic fillings of lens spaces”, arXiv:2209.03193 (2022).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.