Additional enumerations for 321-avoiding Fishburn permutations

About 4 years old · traced to

Let Fn(σ1,…,σk)F_n(\sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_k) denote Fishburn permutations of length nn avoiding each listed pattern, and let (Fn)(F_n) be the Fibonacci sequence under the paper's indexing convention.

Additional enumeration conjectures. The following identities are conjectured:

∣Fn(321,1243)∣=∣Fn(321,2134)∣=n2−3n+4(n≥2),|F_n(321,1243)|=|F_n(321,2134)|=n^2-3n+4\quad(n\geq 2), ∣Fn(321,1324)∣=32n2−132n+10(n≥3),|F_n(321,1324)|=\frac{3}{2}n^2-\frac{13}{2}n+10\quad(n\geq 3), ∣Fn(321,3142,2143)∣=∣Fn(321,1423,2143)∣=∣Fn(321,2143,3124)∣=∣Fn(321,2143,4123)∣=(n2)+1(n≥0),|F_n(321,3142,2143)|=|F_n(321,1423,2143)|=|F_n(321,2143,3124)|=|F_n(321,2143,4123)|=\binom{n}{2}+1\quad(n\geq 0), ∣Fn(321,1423,3124)∣=Fn+2(n≥4),|F_n(321,1423,3124)|=F_n+2\quad(n\geq 4), ∣Fn(321,1423,4123)∣=∣Fn(321,3124,4123)∣=Fn+1−1(n≥1),|F_n(321,1423,4123)|=|F_n(321,3124,4123)|=F_{n+1}-1\quad(n\geq 1), ∣Fn(321,14253)∣=∣Fn(321,21354)∣=2n−(n2)−1(n≥1).|F_n(321,14253)|=|F_n(321,21354)|=2^n-\binom{n}{2}-1\quad(n\geq 1).

The source says all these identities were verified for n≤20n\leq 20; no general proofs are given.

References

Primary source

Eric S. Egge, “Pattern-Avoiding Fishburn Permutations and Ascent Sequences”, arXiv:2208.01484 (2022).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A 2023 paper gives general proofs of all the listed counting formulas, while a separate posted complete-proof claim is unverified.

Eric S. Egge posed these identities as conjectures in 2022; the original paper reported verification only through n≤20n\leq 20 and supplied no general proofs.

February 2023 general proof

Yujie Du and Philip B. Zhang’s paper proves Egge’s Conjectures 10.14 and 10.17, covering all displayed identities: the quadratic formulas, the four formulas equal to (n2)+1\binom{n}{2}+1, the Fibonacci formulas, and the two formulas involving 2n−(n2)−12^n-\binom{n}{2}-1. These are presented as general theorems in the paper, not finite checks.

Posted attempt

A reader claims that later literature proves the conjectures and identifies the Du–Zhang paper. This is a complete-proof claim, but the attempt itself has not been independently verified; the paper cited above independently supports the resolution.

Current status (as of August 2026): All listed identities are proved by Du and Zhang for their stated ranges, and no part of this conjectural list remains open.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

This conjecture has been proved in later literature.

The identities in this MathDB entry are exactly Conjecture 10.17 of Eric S. Egge:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.01484

Yujie Du and Philip B. Zhang prove that conjecture in arXiv:2302.13767v3:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13767v3

The journal version is Yujie Du and Philip B. Zhang, “On enumeration of pattern-avoiding Fishburn permutations,” Discrete Mathematics 347 (2024), Article 113952:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2024.113952

The exact correspondence is:

  • Theorem 2.1 proves the formula for Fn(321,1243)F_n(321,1243).
  • Theorem 2.4 proves the formula for Fn(321,2134)F_n(321,2134).
  • Theorem 2.6 proves the formula for Fn(321,1324)F_n(321,1324).
  • Theorems 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, and 3.7 prove the four formulas equal to (n2)+1\binom{n}{2}+1.
  • Theorem 3.9 proves the formula ∣Fn(321,1423,3124)∣=Fn+2|F_n(321,1423,3124)|=F_n+2.
  • Theorems 3.12 and 3.15 prove the two formulas equal to Fn+1−1F_{n+1}-1.
  • Theorems 4.1 and 4.3 prove the two formulas equal to 2n−(n2)−12^n-\binom{n}{2}-1.

The common structural starting point is Lemma 1.1 of that paper: if π∈Fn(321)\pi\in F_n(321), then the entry 11 is in the first or second position. Indeed, suppose it occurs later and write x=π1x=\pi_1, y=π2y=\pi_2. If x>yx>y, then x,y,1x,y,1 form a 321-pattern. If x<yx<y, then x−1x-1 occurs after yy, so x,y,x−1x,y,x-1 form the forbidden Fishburn bivincular pattern. Both alternatives are impossible.

The paper then splits every avoidance class according to whether π1=1\pi_1=1 or π2=1\pi_2=1, classifies the resulting normal forms, and sums their cardinalities. The theorem numbers above give the resulting all-nn enumerations.

Thus all twelve enumerative statements, equivalently all identities (38)–(43) of Egge’s Conjecture 10.17, are proved. This MathDB entry should therefore be marked solved.