Additional enumerations for 321-avoiding Fishburn permutations
Let denote Fishburn permutations of length avoiding each listed pattern, and let be the Fibonacci sequence under the paper's indexing convention.
Additional enumeration conjectures. The following identities are conjectured:
The source says all these identities were verified for ; no general proofs are given.
References
Primary source
Eric S. Egge, “Pattern-Avoiding Fishburn Permutations and Ascent Sequences”, arXiv:2208.01484 (2022).
Progress summary
A 2023 paper gives general proofs of all the listed counting formulas, while a separate posted complete-proof claim is unverified.
Eric S. Egge posed these identities as conjectures in 2022; the original paper reported verification only through and supplied no general proofs.
February 2023 general proof
Yujie Du and Philip B. Zhang’s paper proves Egge’s Conjectures 10.14 and 10.17, covering all displayed identities: the quadratic formulas, the four formulas equal to , the Fibonacci formulas, and the two formulas involving . These are presented as general theorems in the paper, not finite checks.
Posted attempt
A reader claims that later literature proves the conjectures and identifies the Du–Zhang paper. This is a complete-proof claim, but the attempt itself has not been independently verified; the paper cited above independently supports the resolution.
Current status (as of August 2026): All listed identities are proved by Du and Zhang for their stated ranges, and no part of this conjectural list remains open.
Sources
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
This conjecture has been proved in later literature.
The identities in this MathDB entry are exactly Conjecture 10.17 of Eric S. Egge:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.01484
Yujie Du and Philip B. Zhang prove that conjecture in arXiv:2302.13767v3:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13767v3
The journal version is Yujie Du and Philip B. Zhang, “On enumeration of pattern-avoiding Fishburn permutations,” Discrete Mathematics 347 (2024), Article 113952:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2024.113952
The exact correspondence is:
- Theorem 2.1 proves the formula for .
- Theorem 2.4 proves the formula for .
- Theorem 2.6 proves the formula for .
- Theorems 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, and 3.7 prove the four formulas equal to .
- Theorem 3.9 proves the formula .
- Theorems 3.12 and 3.15 prove the two formulas equal to .
- Theorems 4.1 and 4.3 prove the two formulas equal to .
The common structural starting point is Lemma 1.1 of that paper: if , then the entry is in the first or second position. Indeed, suppose it occurs later and write , . If , then form a 321-pattern. If , then occurs after , so form the forbidden Fishburn bivincular pattern. Both alternatives are impossible.
The paper then splits every avoidance class according to whether or , classifies the resulting normal forms, and sums their cardinalities. The theorem numbers above give the resulting all- enumerations.
Thus all twelve enumerative statements, equivalently all identities (38)–(43) of Egge’s Conjecture 10.17, are proved. This MathDB entry should therefore be marked solved.