Bergdall–Pollack slope-invariant conjecture for ghost series under direct sum

Let p7p\geq 7 be prime, let NN be coprime to pp, and let Kp=GL2(Zp)\mathrm{K}_p=\operatorname{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}_p). Let OCp\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{C}_p} be the ring of integers of Cp\mathbb{C}_p, with maximal ideal mCp\mathbf{m}_{\mathbb{C}_p}. Given two OKp\mathcal{O}\llbracket \mathrm{K}_p\rrbracket-projective augmented modules H~1\widetilde{\mathrm{H}}_1 and H~2\widetilde{\mathrm{H}}_2 of related type, let G1(w,)G_1(w,-), G2(w,)G_2(w,-), and G3(w,)G_3(w,-) denote, respectively, the corresponding ghost series of H~1\widetilde{\mathrm{H}}_1, H~2\widetilde{\mathrm{H}}_2, and H~1H~2\widetilde{\mathrm{H}}_1\oplus\widetilde{\mathrm{H}}_2. Bergdall–Pollack's slope-invariant conjecture. The Newton polygons of (G1G2)(w,)(G_1\cdot G_2)(w_\star,-) and G3(w,)G_3(w_\star,-) should be the same for every wmCpw_\star\in\mathbf{m}_{\mathbb{C}_p}. This conjecture asserts that the slope data of the ghost series is invariant under direct sum of related-type augmented modules; it is a reformulation of a question posed after the local ghost conjecture. The local ghost conjecture itself is known under a genericity hypothesis, but the direct-sum assertion is not resolved in the supplied text.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Rufei Ren, “The slope-invariant of local ghost series under direct sum”, arXiv:2207.12145 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.