The higher-order recurrence conjecture for Bohr-Hamming balls

From papers

For rNr\in\mathbb N, let BH:=BH(β,y,k,ε)BH:=BH(\bm\beta,\bm y,k,\varepsilon) be a proper Bohr-Hamming Ball, with ε>0\varepsilon>0 and yTry\in\mathbb T^r. Define

BH1/k:=nN:nkBH.BH^{1/k}:=\\{n\in\mathbb N:n^k\in BH\\}.

A set is (δ,k)(\delta,k)-recurrent when it has the (δ,k)(\delta,k)-recurrence property used in the paper. Higher-order recurrence conjecture. For all δ>0\delta>0, there exists k0Nk_0\in\mathbb N such that for every rNr\in\mathbb N and every proper Bohr-Hamming Ball BH:=BH(β,y,k,ε)BH:=BH(\bm\beta,\bm y,k,\varepsilon) with kk0k\geq k_0, ε>0\varepsilon>0 and yTry\in\mathbb T^r, the set BH1/kBH^{1/k} is (δ,k)(\delta,k)-recurrent. This is proposed as an analogue of the preceding recurrence lemma and as a possible route toward higher-order recurrence results for k3k\geq3; the source does not indicate whether it is known or resolved.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

John T. Griesmer, “A set of 2-recurrence whose perfect squares do not form a set of measurable recurrence”, arXiv:2207.11851 (2023).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.