Hamilton-cycle time-and-budget trade-off conjecture

Let a (t,b)(t,b)-strategy BB of Builder be a strategy that observes at most tt arriving edges and purchases at most bb of them. A graph is Hamiltonian if it contains a Hamilton cycle. Hamilton-cycle time-and-budget trade-off conjecture. There exists ε>0\varepsilon>0 such that, if

t(1+ε)nlogn/2andb(1+ε)n,t\le(1+\varepsilon)n\log n/2\quad\text{and}\quad b\le(1+\varepsilon)n,

then for any (t,b)(t,b)-strategy BB of Builder,

limnP(Bt is Hamiltonian)=0.\lim_{n\to\infty} \mathbb{P}(B_t\text{ is Hamiltonian})=0.

The conjecture says that simultaneously near-optimal observation time and near-optimal budget do not suffice to construct a Hamilton cycle with high probability. It complements the paper's results showing success when either time or budget is inflated by a constant factor.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Alan Frieze, Michael Krivelevich and Peleg Michaeli, “Fast construction on a restricted budget”, arXiv:2207.07251 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.