Canonical quantum cohomology conjecture for hyperplane sections of type AnA_n adjoint varieties

At least 3 years old · documented by

Let XX be an adjoint variety of type AnA_n, and let Y⊂XY\subset X be a general hyperplane section. Let QH(X)can{\rm QH}(X)_{\rm can} and QH(Y)can{\rm QH}(Y)_{\rm can} denote the restrictions of the quantum cohomology algebras to the canonical curve, obtained by setting the two quantum parameters equal. Canonical semisimplicity conjecture. The algebra

QH(Y)can{\rm QH}(Y)_{\rm can}

is semi-simple if and only if nn is even. The corresponding ambient algebra QH(X)can{\rm QH}(X)_{\rm can} is known to be semi-simple exactly when nn is even, while the assertion for the hyperplane section is posed as a conjecture.

References

Primary source

Vladimiro Benedetti and Nicolas Perrin, “Cohomology of hyperplane sections of (co)adjoint varieties”, arXiv:2207.02089 (2022).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

The even-dimensional case is known, and a new unverified argument claims to settle the remaining odd-dimensional case.

Benedetti and Perrin posed the conjecture in 2022: for a type-AnA_n adjoint variety and a general hyperplane section, the canonical quantum cohomology is semisimple exactly when nn is even.

Known results

  • Benedetti--Perrin, 2022: QH(X)can\mathrm{QH}(X)_{\mathrm{can}} is semisimple exactly when nn is even.
  • Benedetti--Perrin, 2022: QH(Y)can\mathrm{QH}(Y)_{\mathrm{can}} is semisimple for even nn.
  • A 2025 Benedetti--Perrin paper gives related generic semisimplicity criteria, but does not settle the odd canonical case.

Community submission (unverified), August 24, 2026

A submitted argument claims an explicit Jordan chain showing non-semisimplicity on q1+(−1)nq2=0q_1+(-1)^nq_2=0. It therefore claims the odd canonical case, and additionally an even anti-diagonal non-semisimplicity result; the argument has not received external expert review.

Current status (as of August 2026): the even-nn case is established, while the odd-nn case has only an unverified submitted argument and is not confirmed solved.

Sources

Solutions 1

This solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

\documentclass[11pt]{amsart}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{lmodern} \usepackage{microtype} \usepackage[a4paper,margin=30mm]{geometry} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,mathtools} \usepackage{enumitem} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage[colorlinks=true,linkcolor=blue!45!black,citecolor=blue!45!black, urlcolor=blue!55!black]{hyperref} \setlength{\emergencystretch}{2em}

\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem} \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary} \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma} \theoremstyle{remark} \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}

\newcommand{\QH}{\mathrm{QH}} \newcommand{\Disc}{\mathrm{Disc}} \newcommand{\one}{\mathbf{1}}

\title[A discriminant Jordan chain]{A Discriminant Jordan Chain for Type-AA Adjoint Hyperplane Sections} \author{} \date{August 24, 2026} \hypersetup{ pdftitle={A Discriminant Jordan Chain for Type-A Adjoint Hyperplane Sections}, pdfsubject={Explicit non-semisimplicity on the quantum-parameter discriminant}, pdfkeywords={quantum cohomology, adjoint variety, hyperplane section, semisimplicity, Jordan chain} }

\begin{document}

\begin{abstract} Let YY be a general hyperplane section of the adjoint variety of type AnA_n, with quantum parameters q1,q2q_1,q_2. Using only the quantum Chevalley formulas of Benedetti--Perrin, we construct explicit classes vn,wnv_n,w_n satisfying

h1⋆vn=wn,h1⋆wn=−q1(q1+(−1)nq2)(h1+h2).h_1\star v_n=w_n, \qquad h_1\star w_n=-q_1\bigl(q_1+(-1)^nq_2\bigr)(h_1+h_2).

It follows that every fiber on q1+(−1)nq2=0q_1+(-1)^nq_2=0 is non-semisimple. This recovers the odd-rank canonical case of Benedetti--Perrin's Conjecture~1.12, adds an even-rank anti-diagonal family, and proves that the known non-semisimple locus of the ambient adjoint variety is contained in that of its hyperplane section. The argument is complete relative to the published Chevalley formulas, but this research note has not yet received external expert review. \end{abstract}

\maketitle

\section{Setup and statement}

Fix n≥3n\geq 3. Let XX be the adjoint variety of type AnA_n, and let Y⊂XY\subset X be a general hyperplane section. We use the Schubert basis and the two quantum parameters q1,q2q_1,q_2 from Benedetti--Perrin \cite[Theorem~6.2]{BP}. Put

Ai=σαi,Bi=σ−αi,Ci=σαi,i+2,L1=σ−α1,n,L2=σ−α2,n+1,\one=σΘ,p=σ−Θ=[pt].\begin{gathered} A_i=\sigma_{\alpha_i},\qquad B_i=\sigma_{-\alpha_i},\qquad C_i=\sigma_{\alpha_{i,i+2}},\\ L_1=\sigma_{-\alpha_{1,n}},\qquad L_2=\sigma_{-\alpha_{2,n+1}},\qquad \one=\sigma_\Theta,\qquad p=\sigma_{-\Theta}=[\mathrm{pt}]. \end{gathered}

Let s=(−1)ns=(-1)^n and define \begin{align} v_n&=q_1\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}(-1)^iC_i+s(L_1-L_2),\label{eq:v}\ w_n&=q_1\sum_{i=1}^{n}(-1)^iA_i \notag\ &\quad +q_1\sum_{i=2}^{n-1}(-1)^{i+1}B_i-q_1^2\one-sp. \label{eq:w} \end{align} The point-class coefficient of wnw_n is −s∈{±1}-s\in\{\pm1\}; hence wnw_n remains nonzero after every specialization of q1,q2q_1,q_2.

\begin{theorem}[Universal discriminant identity]\label{thm:identity} In \QH(Y)\QH(Y) over Q[q1,q2]\mathbb Q[q_1,q_2], for every n≥3n\geq3, \begin{equation}\label{eq:universal} \boxed{h_1\star v_n=w_n}, \qquad \boxed{h_1\star w_n =-q_1\bigl(q_1+(-1)^nq_2\bigr)(h_1+h_2)}. \end{equation} Consequently, let kk be a characteristic-zero field and let (a,b)∈k2(a,b)\in k^2 satisfy a+(−1)nb=0a+(-1)^n b=0. Then the specialized algebra

\QH(Y)(a,b):=\QH(Y)⊗Q[q1,q2]k,q1⟼a,q2⟼b,\QH(Y)_{(a,b)} :=\QH(Y)\otimes_{\mathbb Q[q_1,q_2]} k, \qquad q_1\longmapsto a,\quad q_2\longmapsto b,

is not semisimple. \end{theorem}

\section{Proof of the universal identity}

We use only the following instances of \cite[Theorem~6.2]{BP}. With the conventions B0=Bn+1=0B_0=B_{n+1}=0, \begin{align} h_1\star C_i &=A_i+B_i+B_{i-1}+B_{i+1}+q_1\delta_{i,1}\one,\label{eq:C}\ h_1\star L_1 &=q_1(A_n+B_n+B_{n-1})+q_1q_2\one,\label{eq:L1}\ h_1\star L_2 &=p+q_1q_2\one. \label{eq:L2} \end{align}

\subsection*{The first identity} Apply \eqref{eq:C}--\eqref{eq:L2} to \eqref{eq:v}. The two q1q2q_1q_2 terms cancel in s(h1⋆L1−h1⋆L2)s(h_1\star L_1-h_1\star L_2). The coefficients of the AiA_i are

q1(−1)i(1≤i≤n−1),sq1=q1(−1)n(i=n).q_1(-1)^i\quad(1\leq i\leq n-1), \qquad sq_1=q_1(-1)^n\quad(i=n).

For the BiB_i, the alternating sum gives zero at B1B_1; q1(−1)i+1q_1(-1)^{i+1} for 2≤i≤n−22\leq i\leq n-2; zero at Bn−1B_{n-1} before the additional contribution sq1sq_1 from sL1sL_1; and −sq1+sq1=0-sq_1+sq_1=0 at BnB_n. The correction from C1C_1 is −q12\one-q_1^2\one, while −sL2-sL_2 contributes −sp-sp. These are exactly the coefficients in \eqref{eq:w}. Therefore

h1⋆vn=wn.h_1\star v_n=w_n.

The same boundary calculation applies when n=3n=3; the interior range is then empty.

\subsection*{The second identity} Theorem~6.2(3) of \cite{BP} gives

h1⋆Ai=h1⋆Bi.h_1\star A_i=h_1\star B_i.

Thus the terms indexed by 2≤i≤n−12\leq i\leq n-1 cancel in h1⋆wnh_1\star w_n. The remaining formulas are \begin{align*} h_1\star B_1&=q_1h_2,\ h_1\star B_n&=\sigma_{-\alpha_{n-1,n+1}},\ h_1\star p &=q_1\sigma_{-\alpha_{n-1,n+1}}+q_1q_2(h_1+h_2). \end{align*} Writing N=σ−αn−1,n+1N=\sigma_{-\alpha_{n-1,n+1}}, we obtain \begin{align*} h_1\star w_n &=-q_1(q_1h_2)+sq_1N-q_1^2h_1 -s\bigl(q_1N+q_1q_2(h_1+h_2)\bigr)\ &=-q_1(q_1+sq_2)(h_1+h_2), \end{align*} which is the second identity in \eqref{eq:universal}.

\begin{lemma}\label{lem:linear} Let AA be a finite-dimensional commutative semisimple algebra over a characteristic-zero field. After extending scalars to an algebraic closure, every multiplication operator Mx ⁣:A→AM_x\colon A\to A is diagonalizable. \end{lemma}

\begin{proof} After scalar extension, AA is a finite product of copies of the algebraic closure. Multiplication is coordinatewise and hence diagonal in the idempotent basis. \end{proof}

Now specialize to a+(−1)nb=0a+(-1)^n b=0. Equation~\eqref{eq:universal} becomes

Mh1(vn)=wn≠0,Mh1(wn)=0.M_{h_1}(v_n)=w_n\neq0, \qquad M_{h_1}(w_n)=0.

This is a nontrivial length-two Jordan chain. Indeed, if vnv_n were a multiple of wnw_n, the two displayed relations would contradict wn≠0w_n\neq0. Lemma~\ref{lem:linear} therefore rules out semisimplicity and completes the proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:identity}.

\section{Consequences}

Define the parameter hyperplane

Dn={(q1,q2):q1+(−1)nq2=0}.D_n=\{(q_1,q_2):q_1+(-1)^nq_2=0\}.

\begin{corollary}[Discriminant containment]\label{cor:disc} The hyperplane DnD_n is contained in the non-semisimple locus of \QH(Y)\QH(Y). For the ambient type-AnA_n adjoint variety, the same equation defines its non-semisimple locus \cite[Proposition~1.8]{SP}. Hence, fiberwise,

\Disc(\QH(X))⊆\Disc(\QH(Y)).\Disc\bigl(\QH(X)\bigr) \subseteq \Disc\bigl(\QH(Y)\bigr).

\end{corollary}

\begin{corollary}[Canonical parity] On the canonical line q1=q2=qq_1=q_2=q, the equation of DnD_n holds identically when nn is odd. Thus \QH(Y)can\QH(Y)_{\mathrm{can}} is not semisimple for every odd n≥3n\geq3. Together with the even-rank result \cite[Proposition6.4]{BP}, this proves Conjecture1.12 of \cite{BP} for all n≥2n\geq2. \end{corollary}

\begin{corollary}[Even-rank anti-diagonal] For every even n≥4n\geq4, the fibers on q2=−q1q_2=-q_1 are not semisimple. \end{corollary}

The parity in the canonical conjecture is therefore explained by how the diagonal q1=q2q_1=q_2 meets the uniform discriminant hyperplane DnD_n: it is contained in DnD_n for odd nn, whereas for even nn it meets DnD_n only at the origin.

\section{Scope, verification, and next question}

Theorem~\ref{thm:identity} proves the inclusion Dn⊆\Disc(\QH(Y))D_n\subseteq \Disc(\QH(Y)). It does \emph{not} prove the converse

q1+(−1)nq2≠0⟹\QH(Y)(q1,q2) is semisimple.q_1+(-1)^nq_2\neq0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \QH(Y)_{(q_1,q_2)}\ \text{is semisimple}.

The even-rank canonical proof in \cite{BP} uses additional information about the common zero eigenspace and its intersection form. Extending that part to an arbitrary parameter ratio requires products not determined by the divisor Chevalley matrices alone.

As reproducibility checks, the two-parameter divisor matrices verify \eqref{eq:universal} symbolically for 3≤n≤93\leq n\leq9, and an independent sparse implementation verifies it over Q[q1,q2]\mathbb Q[q_1,q_2] for every 3≤n≤5013\leq n\leq501. These finite checks are not the proof; the proof is the uniform coefficient cancellation above. No division by q1q_1, q2q_2, or q1+(−1)nq2q_1+(-1)^nq_2 occurs, so the argument includes the coordinate boundaries and the origin.

The strongest natural next question is whether the reverse discriminant inclusion holds. Until this note receives independent expert review, the result should be cited as a candidate theorem rather than as an accepted published result.

\begin{thebibliography}{9}

\bibitem{BP} V.~Benedetti and N.~Perrin, \emph{Cohomology of hyperplane sections of (co)adjoint varieties}, arXiv:2207.02089 (2022), \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02089}.

\bibitem{SP} M.~Smirnov and N.~Perrin, \emph{On the big quantum cohomology of coadjoint varieties}, Selecta Mathematica, \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-025-01017-w} {doi:10.1007/s00029-025-01017-w}.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}