Canonical quantum cohomology conjecture for hyperplane sections of type adjoint varieties
Let be an adjoint variety of type , and let be a general hyperplane section. Let and denote the restrictions of the quantum cohomology algebras to the canonical curve, obtained by setting the two quantum parameters equal. Canonical semisimplicity conjecture. The algebra
is semi-simple if and only if is even. The corresponding ambient algebra is known to be semi-simple exactly when is even, while the assertion for the hyperplane section is posed as a conjecture.
References
Primary source
Vladimiro Benedetti and Nicolas Perrin, “Cohomology of hyperplane sections of (co)adjoint varieties”, arXiv:2207.02089 (2022).
Progress summary
The even-dimensional case is known, and a new unverified argument claims to settle the remaining odd-dimensional case.
Benedetti and Perrin posed the conjecture in 2022: for a type- adjoint variety and a general hyperplane section, the canonical quantum cohomology is semisimple exactly when is even.
Known results
- Benedetti--Perrin, 2022: is semisimple exactly when is even.
- Benedetti--Perrin, 2022: is semisimple for even .
- A 2025 Benedetti--Perrin paper gives related generic semisimplicity criteria, but does not settle the odd canonical case.
Community submission (unverified), August 24, 2026
A submitted argument claims an explicit Jordan chain showing non-semisimplicity on . It therefore claims the odd canonical case, and additionally an even anti-diagonal non-semisimplicity result; the argument has not received external expert review.
Current status (as of August 2026): the even- case is established, while the odd- case has only an unverified submitted argument and is not confirmed solved.
Solutions 1
This solution needs a summarySee full solution
\documentclass[11pt]{amsart}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{lmodern} \usepackage{microtype} \usepackage[a4paper,margin=30mm]{geometry} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,mathtools} \usepackage{enumitem} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage[colorlinks=true,linkcolor=blue!45!black,citecolor=blue!45!black, urlcolor=blue!55!black]{hyperref} \setlength{\emergencystretch}{2em}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem} \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary} \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma} \theoremstyle{remark} \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newcommand{\QH}{\mathrm{QH}} \newcommand{\Disc}{\mathrm{Disc}} \newcommand{\one}{\mathbf{1}}
\title[A discriminant Jordan chain]{A Discriminant Jordan Chain for Type- Adjoint Hyperplane Sections} \author{} \date{August 24, 2026} \hypersetup{ pdftitle={A Discriminant Jordan Chain for Type-A Adjoint Hyperplane Sections}, pdfsubject={Explicit non-semisimplicity on the quantum-parameter discriminant}, pdfkeywords={quantum cohomology, adjoint variety, hyperplane section, semisimplicity, Jordan chain} }
\begin{document}
\begin{abstract} Let be a general hyperplane section of the adjoint variety of type , with quantum parameters . Using only the quantum Chevalley formulas of Benedetti--Perrin, we construct explicit classes satisfying
It follows that every fiber on is non-semisimple. This recovers the odd-rank canonical case of Benedetti--Perrin's Conjecture~1.12, adds an even-rank anti-diagonal family, and proves that the known non-semisimple locus of the ambient adjoint variety is contained in that of its hyperplane section. The argument is complete relative to the published Chevalley formulas, but this research note has not yet received external expert review. \end{abstract}
\maketitle
\section{Setup and statement}
Fix . Let be the adjoint variety of type , and let be a general hyperplane section. We use the Schubert basis and the two quantum parameters from Benedetti--Perrin \cite[Theorem~6.2]{BP}. Put
Let and define \begin{align} v_n&=q_1\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}(-1)^iC_i+s(L_1-L_2),\label{eq:v}\ w_n&=q_1\sum_{i=1}^{n}(-1)^iA_i \notag\ &\quad +q_1\sum_{i=2}^{n-1}(-1)^{i+1}B_i-q_1^2\one-sp. \label{eq:w} \end{align} The point-class coefficient of is ; hence remains nonzero after every specialization of .
\begin{theorem}[Universal discriminant identity]\label{thm:identity} In over , for every , \begin{equation}\label{eq:universal} \boxed{h_1\star v_n=w_n}, \qquad \boxed{h_1\star w_n =-q_1\bigl(q_1+(-1)^nq_2\bigr)(h_1+h_2)}. \end{equation} Consequently, let be a characteristic-zero field and let satisfy . Then the specialized algebra
is not semisimple. \end{theorem}
\section{Proof of the universal identity}
We use only the following instances of \cite[Theorem~6.2]{BP}. With the conventions , \begin{align} h_1\star C_i &=A_i+B_i+B_{i-1}+B_{i+1}+q_1\delta_{i,1}\one,\label{eq:C}\ h_1\star L_1 &=q_1(A_n+B_n+B_{n-1})+q_1q_2\one,\label{eq:L1}\ h_1\star L_2 &=p+q_1q_2\one. \label{eq:L2} \end{align}
\subsection*{The first identity} Apply \eqref{eq:C}--\eqref{eq:L2} to \eqref{eq:v}. The two terms cancel in . The coefficients of the are
For the , the alternating sum gives zero at ; for ; zero at before the additional contribution from ; and at . The correction from is , while contributes . These are exactly the coefficients in \eqref{eq:w}. Therefore
The same boundary calculation applies when ; the interior range is then empty.
\subsection*{The second identity} Theorem~6.2(3) of \cite{BP} gives
Thus the terms indexed by cancel in . The remaining formulas are \begin{align*} h_1\star B_1&=q_1h_2,\ h_1\star B_n&=\sigma_{-\alpha_{n-1,n+1}},\ h_1\star p &=q_1\sigma_{-\alpha_{n-1,n+1}}+q_1q_2(h_1+h_2). \end{align*} Writing , we obtain \begin{align*} h_1\star w_n &=-q_1(q_1h_2)+sq_1N-q_1^2h_1 -s\bigl(q_1N+q_1q_2(h_1+h_2)\bigr)\ &=-q_1(q_1+sq_2)(h_1+h_2), \end{align*} which is the second identity in \eqref{eq:universal}.
\begin{lemma}\label{lem:linear} Let be a finite-dimensional commutative semisimple algebra over a characteristic-zero field. After extending scalars to an algebraic closure, every multiplication operator is diagonalizable. \end{lemma}
\begin{proof} After scalar extension, is a finite product of copies of the algebraic closure. Multiplication is coordinatewise and hence diagonal in the idempotent basis. \end{proof}
Now specialize to . Equation~\eqref{eq:universal} becomes
This is a nontrivial length-two Jordan chain. Indeed, if were a multiple of , the two displayed relations would contradict . Lemma~\ref{lem:linear} therefore rules out semisimplicity and completes the proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:identity}.
\section{Consequences}
Define the parameter hyperplane
\begin{corollary}[Discriminant containment]\label{cor:disc} The hyperplane is contained in the non-semisimple locus of . For the ambient type- adjoint variety, the same equation defines its non-semisimple locus \cite[Proposition~1.8]{SP}. Hence, fiberwise,
\end{corollary}
\begin{corollary}[Canonical parity]
On the canonical line , the equation of holds identically
when is odd. Thus is not semisimple for every odd
. Together with the even-rank result
\cite[Proposition6.4]{BP}, this proves Conjecture1.12 of \cite{BP} for all
.
\end{corollary}
\begin{corollary}[Even-rank anti-diagonal] For every even , the fibers on are not semisimple. \end{corollary}
The parity in the canonical conjecture is therefore explained by how the diagonal meets the uniform discriminant hyperplane : it is contained in for odd , whereas for even it meets only at the origin.
\section{Scope, verification, and next question}
Theorem~\ref{thm:identity} proves the inclusion . It does \emph{not} prove the converse
The even-rank canonical proof in \cite{BP} uses additional information about the common zero eigenspace and its intersection form. Extending that part to an arbitrary parameter ratio requires products not determined by the divisor Chevalley matrices alone.
As reproducibility checks, the two-parameter divisor matrices verify \eqref{eq:universal} symbolically for , and an independent sparse implementation verifies it over for every . These finite checks are not the proof; the proof is the uniform coefficient cancellation above. No division by , , or occurs, so the argument includes the coordinate boundaries and the origin.
The strongest natural next question is whether the reverse discriminant inclusion holds. Until this note receives independent expert review, the result should be cited as a candidate theorem rather than as an accepted published result.
\begin{thebibliography}{9}
\bibitem{BP} V.~Benedetti and N.~Perrin, \emph{Cohomology of hyperplane sections of (co)adjoint varieties}, arXiv:2207.02089 (2022), \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02089}.
\bibitem{SP} M.~Smirnov and N.~Perrin, \emph{On the big quantum cohomology of coadjoint varieties}, Selecta Mathematica, \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-025-01017-w} {doi:10.1007/s00029-025-01017-w}.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}